找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ezumezu; A System of Logic fo Jonathan O. Chimakonam Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 36485|回復(fù): 50
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:28:52 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Ezumezu
副標(biāo)題A System of Logic fo
編輯Jonathan O. Chimakonam
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/321/320160/320160.mp4
概述Introduces new concepts in African philosophy.Gives insights for the intellectual transformation of African scholarship.Offers an alternative logic system for grounding African philosophy and studies
圖書封面Titlebook: Ezumezu; A System of Logic fo Jonathan O. Chimakonam Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to
描述.The issue of a logic foundation for African thought connects well with the question of method. Do we need new methods for African philosophy and studies? Or, are the methods of Western thought adequate for African intellectual space? These questions are not some of the easiest to answer because they lead straight to the question of whether or not a logic tradition from African intellectual space is possible. Thus in charting the course of future direction in African philosophy and studies, one must be confronted with this question of logic. The author boldly takes up this challenge and becomes the first to do so in a book by introducing new concepts and formulating a new African culture-inspired system of logic called Ezumezu which he believes would ground new methods in African philosophy and studies. He develops this system to rescue African philosophy and, by extension, sundry fields in African Indigenous Knowledge Systems from the spell of Plato and the hegemony of Aristotle. African philosophers can now ground their discourses in Ezumezu logic which will distinguish their philosophy as a tradition in its own right. On the whole, the book engages with some of the lingering con
出版日期Book 2019
關(guān)鍵詞Alternative Logic Systems; Systems of African logic; Developments in African Thought Systems; Ezumezu L
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11075-8
isbn_ebook978-3-030-11075-8
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Ezumezu影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ezumezu影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ezumezu網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Ezumezu網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ezumezu被引頻次




書目名稱Ezumezu被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ezumezu年度引用




書目名稱Ezumezu年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ezumezu讀者反饋




書目名稱Ezumezu讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:56:17 | 只看該作者
In Search of a Logic-Based Foundation for African Philosophy and Studiesnswer the question about the criterion or the Africanness of philosophy. The criterion question asks two simple but challenging questions in African philosophy and they are: what makes a discourse, philosophy? And what makes a philosophy, African? I posit a logic-based criterion for African philosop
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:31:15 | 只看該作者
Some Problematics in African Logic however threatened to veer it off-course. Instead of engaging in robust rigorous conversations, some logicians and philosophers have taken to apologias while others have taken to polemicism both of which have narrowed their visions to a debate about the correctness and incorrectness of the idea of
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:58:58 | 只看該作者
The Schools of Thought in African Logic first two are haunted by the essentialist ideologies of Afrocentricism and Eurocentricism, it is the last school that is actually doing the correct thing. I highlight the individual positions or contributions from members of each school and show where they failed or succeeded. I conclude by identif
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:44:04 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:20:05 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:56:38 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:24:16 | 只看該作者
Ezumezu as a Formal Systemasoning and revising assumptions out of which certain conclusions could be drawn from certain premises. Here, I shall discuss the universe of discourse to a variant of three-valued logic called Ezumezu and show that the traditional laws of thought are inadequate hence, I will discuss the three new s
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:37:39 | 只看該作者
How Ezumezu Logic Grounds Some Theories in African Philosophy with a Special Focus on Afro-Communitaphy and studies. I argue that some theories in African philosophy can be grounded in an Africa-developed system of logic to demonstrate their originality and Africanness and deflate the accusation in some quarters that African philosophers copy their Western counterparts or that African philosophy i
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:22:23 | 只看該作者
Justifying the System of Ezumezu Logic: An Analysis of the Problematic Structure of ‘q na abughi q’ of African Logic” and “Carnap and Logical Truth” have stoked the fire of exciting conversations among some philosophers on the nature of logic within African intellectual landscape. I will demonstrate the potency of Etuk’s stimulation as an African philosopher of African origin and transcend the po
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 22:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
郑州市| 虎林市| 旅游| 成都市| 郴州市| 杭州市| 石河子市| 灵台县| 铜山县| 凭祥市| 武定县| 漳州市| 沁阳市| 张掖市| 定州市| 山东省| 五大连池市| 锡林郭勒盟| 紫金县| 上饶市| 卢氏县| 泗水县| 将乐县| 黑山县| 蚌埠市| 五原县| 柏乡县| 军事| 岢岚县| 印江| 华蓥市| 卢氏县| 新竹市| 株洲县| 宁晋县| 榆树市| 郯城县| 道孚县| 鹤壁市| 麻栗坡县| 邹城市|