Titlebook: Experts and Consensus in Social Science; Carlo Martini,Marcel Boumans Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Applyin

巧辦法

Agronomy

Private Epistemic Virtue, Public Vices: Moral Responsibility in the Policy Sciencescter of scientific communities can be evaluated morally and be found wanting in terms of moral responsibility. Even an epistemically successful scientific community can be morally responsible for consequences that were unforeseen by it and its members and that follow from policy advice given by its

Encumber

擋泥板

Amber Esping,Jonathan A. Plucker the study of the expert status and its role in policy-making processes. The claim is sustained by reviewing some well-known theses in ideational and related approaches in Comparative Political Economy.

去掉

微不足道

我悲傷

Book 2014ance on the subjective judgment of experts and practitioners is the main source of useful knowledge to address and possibly, bring solutions to social problems. A common phenomenon in applications of science is that objective evidence does not point to a single answer or solution, to a problem. Reli

玩忽職守

背景

Trigger-Point

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3238-9d and explained. A proposal for performing cross validation, based largely on the work of Eggstaff et al. (Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121:72–82, 2014) is formulated and illustrated with data from recent expert judgment studies.