找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Experts and Consensus in Social Science; Carlo Martini,Marcel Boumans Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Applyin

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 9847|回復(fù): 50
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:11:17 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Experts and Consensus in Social Science
編輯Carlo Martini,Marcel Boumans
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/320/319273/319273.mp4
概述Provides an new and unique interdisciplinary approach to expert consensus.Can be used as a handbook on expert consensus.Takes a normative stance on the problem of expertise.Includes supplementary mate
叢書名稱Ethical Economy
圖書封面Titlebook: Experts and Consensus in Social Science;  Carlo Martini,Marcel Boumans Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Applyin
描述This book brings together the research of philosophers, sociologists, and social scientists. It examines those areas of scientific practice where reliance on the subjective judgment of experts and practitioners is the main source of useful knowledge to address and possibly, bring solutions to social problems. A common phenomenon in applications of science is that objective evidence does not point to a single answer or solution, to a problem. Reliance on subjective judgment, then, becomes necessary, despite the known fact that hunches, even those of putative experts, often provide information that is not very accurate, and that experts are prone to fallacies and biases. The book looks at how experts reach consensus in the social sciences, and which experts are relevant to which problems. It aims to answer many questions, the main one being: Can we start building a normative theory of expertise on the basis of the evidence that social scientists, sociologists and philosophers have uncovered?
出版日期Book 2014
關(guān)鍵詞Applying the Neyman-Rubin Model; Attributing Expertise in Uncertain Times; Consensus and Its Critics; C
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08551-7
isbn_softcover978-3-319-34319-8
isbn_ebook978-3-319-08551-7Series ISSN 2211-2707 Series E-ISSN 2211-2723
issn_series 2211-2707
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Experts and Consensus in Social Science影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Experts and Consensus in Social Science影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Experts and Consensus in Social Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Experts and Consensus in Social Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Experts and Consensus in Social Science被引頻次




書目名稱Experts and Consensus in Social Science被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Experts and Consensus in Social Science年度引用




書目名稱Experts and Consensus in Social Science年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Experts and Consensus in Social Science讀者反饋




書目名稱Experts and Consensus in Social Science讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:20:47 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:26:25 | 只看該作者
Model-Based Consensusexpert on the basis of his or her knowledge and ability to judge relevant uncertainties. The measurement of the performance of the experts is based on the expert’s assessment of “seed variables”. These performances are used to determine the weights of the expert’s judgments in the aggregation of the
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:28:59 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:21:51 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:26:52 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:14:32 | 只看該作者
The Expert Economist in Times of Uncertaintycent important contributions. The article identifies the main conceptual dilemma associated with the social scientific study of experts, stemming from the emphasis in either the objective or the relational dimension of the phenomenon of expertise. In this article the attributional or relational aspe
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:24:28 | 只看該作者
Validating Expert Judgment with the Classical Modelince publication of the TU Delft expert judgment database in 2008, various authors have attempted to use this data base for cross validation, splitting the seed variables into training sets and test sets. These attempts are reviewed. Many pitfalls and biases in cross validation efforts are identifie
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:25:58 | 只看該作者
The Truth About Accuracythe term, evaluative judgments about them. We look at operational accuracy as a desirable and evaluable quality of the outcomes and explore how the concepts of accuracy and precision, on the basis of insights borrowed from pragmatics and measurement theory, can be seen to do useful work in epistemol
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:10:26 | 只看該作者
Expert Advisers: Why Economic Forecasters Can Be Useful Even When They Are Wrongent reached by those who have studied a topic in great detail. On the other hand, does the very same specialization that confers expert status also mean that the group is unable to consider all alternatives equally? In other words, do the shared analytic models and other practices that expert groups
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-21 14:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
霸州市| 三门县| 张家港市| 开平市| 闻喜县| 安康市| 阿巴嘎旗| 望都县| 孙吴县| 灵山县| 会东县| 屯昌县| 石河子市| 温泉县| 花莲市| 翁牛特旗| 曲麻莱县| 贵定县| 仙游县| 昌图县| 贵定县| 泗洪县| 堆龙德庆县| 阿瓦提县| 来凤县| 敖汉旗| 夏邑县| 黔东| 金门县| 镇远县| 香港 | 高密市| 胶州市| 和政县| 尉氏县| 乐平市| 察哈| 神农架林区| 晋城| 清流县| 乐昌市|