Titlebook: Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs; Joseph C. Schmid,Daniel J. Linford Book 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 logic

angiography

干涉

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7895-1counts of inertial persistence. We then articulate our existential inertia thesis using our answers to these taxonomic questions. Finally, in hopes of providing a foundation and jumping-off point for further research on existential inertia, we list each taxonomic question in the concluding section.

FIN

Joseph M Masserano,Norman Weinerrsistence on which temporal things (or some subset thereof) persist without external sustenance or conservation unless and until they are positively destroyed. Such accounts include tendency-disposition accounts, transtemporal accounts, law-based accounts, necessity accounts, and no-change accounts.

負擔

,Aquinas’s First Way,f certain interpretations of the conclusion and premises. But such interpretations are found either to be unmotivated or to lend little to no support to classical theism. We also uncover at least six non-sequiturs afflicting the First Way. We conclude by addressing objections to our critical appraisal.

得意牛

Existential Inertia: Thesis and Taxonomy,counts of inertial persistence. We then articulate our existential inertia thesis using our answers to these taxonomic questions. Finally, in hopes of providing a foundation and jumping-off point for further research on existential inertia, we list each taxonomic question in the concluding section.

債務(wù)

The Metaphysics of Existential Inertia,rsistence on which temporal things (or some subset thereof) persist without external sustenance or conservation unless and until they are positively destroyed. Such accounts include tendency-disposition accounts, transtemporal accounts, law-based accounts, necessity accounts, and no-change accounts.

CLAP

Embolic-Stroke

FACET

Stage One of the Aristotelian Proof,ing. The proof is divided into two stages. Stage one seeks to demonstrate the existence of a purely actual, unactualized actualizer, while stage two identifies this unactualized actualizer with God. Our purpose in this chapter is to critically assess the argument’s first stage. We first argue that s

擦掉