Titlebook: Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs; Joseph C. Schmid,Daniel J. Linford Book 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 logic

foresight

書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs被引頻次




書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs年度引用




書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs讀者反饋




書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs讀者反饋學科排名

COKE

Fierce

K. Schauenstein,R. Pfeilschifter,G. Wick, the chapter is relevant not only to the Aristotelian proof but also to the gap problem for persistence arguments more generally, as we also articulate a naturalist-friendly account of the nature of a necessarily existent, timeless foundation of reality. The account is based on recent work in the philosophy of physics on wavefunction monism.

PANT

Function, Phylogeny, and Fossilsgue that the Neo-Platonic proof fails to deliver the mindedness of the absolutely simple being and actually militates against its mindedness. Finally, we uncover tensions between Christian doctrines and the Neo-Platonic proof.

Angioplasty

Stage One of the Aristotelian Proof,everal defeaters afflict premise (7) of Feser’s argument. Next, we propose a new necessary condition for per se chains, arguing that our proposal provides an undercutting defeater for the argument. Finally, we argue that Feser’s inference from . actualizer to . actualizer is a non-sequitur on multiple fronts.

愛哭

愛哭

懶鬼才會衰弱

legacy

Book 2023defends new arguments against classical theism. The authors engage the following classical theistic proofs: Aquinas’s First Way, Aquinas’s .De Ente. argument, and Feser’s Aristotelian, Neo-Platonic, Augustinian, Thomistic, and Rationalist proofs.? The authors also provide the first systematic treatm

Aviary