Titlebook: Evolving Hamlet; Seventeenth-Century Angus Fletcher Book 2011 Angus Fletcher 2011 Hamlet.King Lear.Macbeth.tragedy.William Shakespeare.Bri

多愁善感

書目名稱Evolving Hamlet影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evolving Hamlet影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evolving Hamlet網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Evolving Hamlet網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evolving Hamlet被引頻次




書目名稱Evolving Hamlet被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evolving Hamlet年度引用




書目名稱Evolving Hamlet年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evolving Hamlet讀者反饋




書目名稱Evolving Hamlet讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

沒花的是打擾

Deject

外面

and the Subject of Ocular Proof, in which the lord exclaims, “Give me but proof of it, ocular proof!”. Echoing Othello’s demand that Iago give him “ocular proof” of Desdemona’s infidelity, Lord Touchwood imagines himself vaulting to the heights of tragic pathos. Instead, however, he catches himself in the low coils of dramatic iro

追逐

and the Reason of New World Conflict,rth fully shod. Finding himself unable to reconcile this conflict of values, Volscius pulls off his boots, then puts them on, then pulls them off, then puts them on again. Finally, the befuddled knight hops off stage, wearing one boot and clasping the other. Volscius was a send-up of the heroes who

為寵愛

Cartesian Generosity and the New Shakespeare,fident in his own authority that he boldly scolds kings,. so lofty in his personal regard that he petitions his prospective father-in-law with the domineering: “Believe, old Man, that I her father knew: / What else should make . kneel to you?” (5.1.233–34). Even when the ghost of his own mother appe

為寵愛

and the Endurance of Tragedy,For the next hundred years, audiences agreed,. but in the nineteenth century, the play’s critical fortunes slowly reversed. Schlegel defended Cordelia’s death as a moral necessity, Keats celebrated its “close relationship with Beauty & Truth,” Coleridge insisted that it was grounded on the “moral ve

dilute

The Progress of Ethics,ut practice or experiment. Since at least the time of Plato, philosophers had believed that the mind could discover “the measures of right and wrong” by relying entirely on its own private logic, deriving laws of behavior as perfect and incontestable as the laws of geometry. Indeed, it was for this

乏味

Conclusion,likely. Though it seems incredible that art could provide the missing link in a scientific ethics, seventeenthcentury tragedy suggests that it can. For try as it might, science cannot lend intention to life. The narrow purpose of its experimental method is to uncover the way that nature works, layin

nepotism

Evolving Hamlet978-0-230-11838-6Series ISSN 2945-7297 Series E-ISSN 2945-7300