找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步，快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃，訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science; John Alexander Pinkston Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Philosophical c

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 28676|回復(fù): 41
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:31:12 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science
編輯John Alexander Pinkston
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/318/317514/317514.mp4
概述Presents an innovative approach to confirmation theory in the philosophy of medicine.Provides a defense of randomization as a method to maximize accuracy in the conduct of clinical trials.Considers et
叢書(shū)名稱Synthese Library
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science; John Alexander Pinkston Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Philosophical c
描述.In this book, the author argues that no current philosophical theory of evidence in clinical medical science is adequate. None can accurately explain the way evidence is gathered and used to confirm hypotheses. To correct this, he proposes a new approach called the weight of evidence account. This innovative method supplies a satisfactory explanation and rationale for the “hierarchical pyramid” of evidence–based medicine, with randomized clinical trials and their derivatives, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials at the top and case reports, case series, expert opinion, and the like at the bottom..The author illustrates the development of various “l(fā)evels”?of evidence by considering the evolution of less invasive surgical treatments for early breast cancer. He shows that the weight of evidence account explains the notion of levels of evidence and other efforts to rank them. In addition, he presents a defense of randomization as a method to maximize accuracy in the conduct of clinical trials..The title also considers ethical issues surrounding experimentation with medical therapies in human subjects. It illustrates and discusses these issues in studies
出版日期Book 2020
關(guān)鍵詞Philosophical confirmation theory; Confirmation in medicine; Theories of confirmation; Inference to the
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44270-5
isbn_softcover978-3-030-44272-9
isbn_ebook978-3-030-44270-5Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
issn_series 0166-6991
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Evidence and Hypothesis in Clinical Medical Science讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics
 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty
 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory
 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance
 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:48:45 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:29:24 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:42:10 | 只看該作者
Confirmation of Hypotheses in Clinical Medical Science,discuss three kinds of hypotheses, namely, ., ., and .. Therapeutic hypotheses are those concerned with treatments or other interventions, and etiologic hypotheses are those concerned with disease causation. Diagnostic hypotheses are those considered by clinicians when making a diagnosis. Examples f
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:26:42 | 只看該作者
A Weight of Evidence Account,, which is understood to mean a combination of validity and precision. Validity is concerned with biases and confounding, which can distort the measure of effect, whereas precision is often associated with the width of confidence intervals around the effect measure. Evidence considered to be of grea
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:43:29 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:48:42 | 只看該作者
Justification for the Hierarchical Pyramid of Evidence-Based Medicine and a Defense of Randomizatioine movement to rank evidence according to the degree of evidential support they afford. I also defend the need for randomization in randomized clinical trials against critics from the medical and philosophical communities, and explain why accuracy is thereby improved. I illustrate the process of ho
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:16:49 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:59:43 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:35:04 | 只看該作者
0166-6991 mize accuracy in the conduct of clinical trials.Considers et.In this book, the author argues that no current philosophical theory of evidence in clinical medical science is adequate. None can accurately explain the way evidence is gathered and used to confirm hypotheses. To correct this, he proposes
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 16:38
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
赣州市| 凤山市| 定远县| 磐石市| 广饶县| 定结县| 武汉市| 工布江达县| 东光县| 晴隆县| 凤庆县| 宁远县| 绥棱县| 甘孜| 筠连县| 贵溪市| 河北区| 丹棱县| 永城市| 四子王旗| 丹棱县| 信宜市| 监利县| 吉安市| 锦州市| 元氏县| 大新县| 临清市| 新巴尔虎左旗| 新干县| 噶尔县| 垫江县| 虎林市| 府谷县| 漳浦县| 吉隆县| 宁武县| 封开县| 历史| 中牟县| 乐都县|