Titlebook: Events and Plurality; The Jerusalem Lectur Fred Landman Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000 argue.computational lingui

affront

書目名稱Events and Plurality影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Events and Plurality影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Events and Plurality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Events and Plurality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Events and Plurality被引頻次




書目名稱Events and Plurality被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Events and Plurality年度引用




書目名稱Events and Plurality年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Events and Plurality讀者反饋




書目名稱Events and Plurality讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Repetitions

The Neo-Davidsonian Theory and its Rivals, us to a discussion of the semantics of passivization (in Section 3.2.), and we will see an important application of the Unique Role Requirement when we study the interaction between passive sensitive adverbs and passivization.

大酒杯

,Scha’s Theory of Plurality,her proposals, like Craige Roberts’, will be discussed in later lectures.) For reasons of comparison (and simplicity), I will reformulate the set theoretic proposals of Scha and myself in terms of lattice structures. I will start, then, by defining the plurality structures that I will use in formula

Cacophonous

GRAZE

FILTH

Maximalization on Argument State Types,zation at the event type. I will start the present lecture with a straightforward argument that this theory of maximalization is incompatible with the scope mechanism of lecture Six. After that I will develop a modified scope mechanism, and explore some of its consequences (while the discussion of s

FILTH

Against Binary Quantifiers,e standard unary notion, this does not mean that any of the arguments motivating unary Generalized Quantifier Theory carry over to the binary case. The core of unary Generalized Quantifier Theory is a restrictive theory of the meanings of lexical determiners, and much of the attractiveness of the th

燒瓶

0924-4662 of Jerusalem. In the context of this, Edit Doron asked me to present a series of weekly evening lectures. The idea was that I would be talking about my own current research on plurality in an event based theory, without the restraints that a nonnal seminar fonnat would im- pose: i.e. the idea was th

材料等

,Elektronische St?rstellentheorie,retic proposals of Scha and myself in terms of lattice structures. I will start, then, by defining the plurality structures that I will use in formulating these proposals. I will be rather succinct here. Extensive exposition of these structures can be found in Landman 1991.

Nomogram