找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步，快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃，訪(fǎng)問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evaluation of Online Higher Education; Learning, Interactio Ana Balula,António Moreira Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerl

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 26291|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:09:15 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluation of Online Higher Education
副標(biāo)題Learning, Interactio
編輯Ana Balula,António Moreira
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/318/317342/317342.mp4
概述Develops a method of evaluating e-Teaching in terms of learning, interaction, and technology.Examines Portuguese and European policies on e-Teaching.Presents case studies of online higher education an
叢書(shū)名稱(chēng)SpringerBriefs in Education
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Evaluation of Online Higher Education; Learning, Interactio Ana Balula,António Moreira Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerl
描述.The work presents a theoretical framework for the evaluation of e-Teaching that aims at positioning the online activities designed and developed by the teacher as to the Learning, Interaction and Technology Dimensions..The theoretical research that underlies the study was developed reflecting current thinking on the promotion of quality of teaching and of the integration of information and communication tools into the curriculum in Higher Education (HE), i.e., bearing in mind some European guidelines and policies on this subject. This way, an answer was sought to be given to one of the aims put forward in this study, namely to contribute towards the development of a conceptual framework to support research on evaluation of e-teaching in the context of HE. Based on the theoretical research carried out, an evaluation tool (SCAI) was designed, which integrates the two questionnaires developed to collect the teachers‘ and the students‘ perceptions regarding the development of e-activities. Consequently, an empirical study was structured and carried out, allowing SCAI tool to be tested and validated in real cases. From the comparison of the theoretical framework established and the ana
出版日期Book 2014
關(guān)鍵詞Communication Tools in Higher Education; E-Teaching; E-Teaching Evaluation; ICT in Higher Education; Lea
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05425-4
isbn_softcover978-3-319-05424-7
isbn_ebook978-3-319-05425-4Series ISSN 2211-1921 Series E-ISSN 2211-193X
issn_series 2211-1921
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluation of Online Higher Education影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluation of Online Higher Education影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluation of Online Higher Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluation of Online Higher Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluation of Online Higher Education被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluation of Online Higher Education被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluation of Online Higher Education年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluation of Online Higher Education年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluation of Online Higher Education讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Evaluation of Online Higher Education讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics
 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty
 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory
 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance
 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:13:43 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:34:45 | 只看該作者
2211-1921 activities. Consequently, an empirical study was structured and carried out, allowing SCAI tool to be tested and validated in real cases. From the comparison of the theoretical framework established and the ana978-3-319-05424-7978-3-319-05425-4Series ISSN 2211-1921 Series E-ISSN 2211-193X
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:05:02 | 只看該作者
Book 2014ped to collect the teachers‘ and the students‘ perceptions regarding the development of e-activities. Consequently, an empirical study was structured and carried out, allowing SCAI tool to be tested and validated in real cases. From the comparison of the theoretical framework established and the ana
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:27:35 | 只看該作者
Grundlagen der Erfahrung und Theorie,o the implementation of these activities (e.g. e-learning platforms) should also be taken into account. Resulting from this, three dimensions of the evaluation object—e-learning activities—were defined, namely the Learning, the Interaction and the Technology Dimension, as described below.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:21:30 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:55:54 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:53:55 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:54:35 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:39:35 | 只看該作者
2211-1921 Teaching.Presents case studies of online higher education an.The work presents a theoretical framework for the evaluation of e-Teaching that aims at positioning the online activities designed and developed by the teacher as to the Learning, Interaction and Technology Dimensions..The theoretical rese
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 05:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
兰州市| 香港| 措美县| 上犹县| 满城县| 化德县| 武穴市| 镇康县| 广西| 昌吉市| 两当县| 施秉县| 乌鲁木齐县| 光山县| 武城县| 祁阳县| 深圳市| 交口县| 蓝田县| 彭山县| 宜春市| 三亚市| 星子县| 张北县| 保靖县| 福海县| 盘锦市| 金堂县| 巴彦淖尔市| 贵德县| 永清县| 马龙县| 克什克腾旗| 清苑县| 丰宁| 通渭县| 大足县| 和硕县| 柏乡县| 稷山县| 汪清县|