Titlebook: Evaluation in Planning; Facing the Challenge Nathaniel Lichfield,Angela Barbanente,Anna Prat Book 1998 Springer Nature B.V. 1998 Evaluation

Harrison

書目名稱Evaluation in Planning影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evaluation in Planning影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Evaluation in Planning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Evaluation in Planning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Evaluation in Planning被引頻次




書目名稱Evaluation in Planning被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Evaluation in Planning年度引用




書目名稱Evaluation in Planning年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Evaluation in Planning讀者反饋




書目名稱Evaluation in Planning讀者反饋學科排名

COWER

placebo

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13315-3ainty characterising both cognitive models and organisations involved. This issue is seen as crucial in environmental planning practice, a field where traditional evaluation processes present many undetermined aspects concerning both latent cognitive structures and problems lacking of solution.

Matrimony

,Das Risikoaversionsparadox im μ-σ—Modell,outcomes of planning process are not confined to policies but also include other essential results such as transformative learning (Friedmann, 1987), communicative networks (Forester, 1989), institutional capital (Healey, 1996) and consensus and commitments (Innes, 1994). This development raises com

gorgeous

Ein Phasendiagramm der Besonnung, a new set of goals and expectations. These include the assumption that new large-scale infrastructure and urban revitalisation projects are essential for preserving the current level of welfare in the rat race with other municipalities/regions/countries. At the same time public authorities are face

無效

無效

indenture

的’

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-47498-9 policy experiences..Cultural heritage of historical urban centres assumes a central role in sustainability strategies, focussing on a long-term (past and future) perspective in order to recognize the variety of values, objectives, interest groups and aiming at socio-economic and cultural developmen

繁殖