Titlebook: Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics; Charles P. Friedman,Jeremy C. Wyatt Book 19971st edition Springer Science+Business Media New Yo

大猩猩

寵愛

Computers and Medicinehttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/317268.jpg

事情

Dianne M. Harrison,Susan Plowrightful as that which derives from objectivist studies. While reading what follows, it may be tempting to dismiss subjectivist methods as informal, imprecise, or “subjective.” When carried out well, however, these studies are none of the above. They are equally objective, but in a different way. Profess

生命

Exposure

Gleason-score

Contracture

expeditious

Evaluation as a Field,lt in the real world. The informatics community can take some comfort in the fact that it is not alone. Evaluation is difficult in any field of endeavor. Fortunately, many good minds—representing an array of philosophical orientations, methodological perspectives, and domains of application—have exp

CAPE

Studying Clinical Information Resources,to these challenges. In Chapter 2 we introduced the range of approaches that can be used to conduct evaluations in medical informatics and across many areas of human endeavor. Chapter 2 also stressed that the evaluator can address many of these challenges by viewing each evaluation as anchored by sp

MURAL

Structure of Objectivist Studies,to collect data, and how subsequently to analyze the data. The methods introduced relate directly to the comparison-based, objectives-based, and decision-facilitation approaches to evaluation as introduced in Chapter 2. They are useful for addressing most of the purposes of evaluation in informatics