Titlebook: Evaluating Culture; Well-Being, Institut Matthew Thomas Johnson Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 20

你太謙虛

書目名稱Evaluating Culture影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evaluating Culture影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Culture網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Evaluating Culture網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Culture被引頻次




書目名稱Evaluating Culture被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Culture年度引用




書目名稱Evaluating Culture年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Culture讀者反饋




書目名稱Evaluating Culture讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

排斥

Hiatal-Hernia

STERN

Circumstance, Materialism and Possibilism,ial constructivist approaches — such as those of Edwards et al. (1995) — have rejected realist accounts of the physical environment and suggested that our constraints in this world are imposed by the meanings which guide our perception.

mastopexy

? This book engages with needs and capabilities to advance normative functionalist assessment of the success with which cultural institutions promote eudaemonic wellbeing in given, determinate circumstances.978-1-349-33376-9978-1-137-31379-9

Culmination

The Case Against Cultural Evaluation: Relativism, Culturalism and Romanticism,y, from this position, arguing that matrices of evaluation do have validity but only within particular cultural-linguistic spheres. The third, romantic form is not relativistic at all, holding that the interests of humans lie in pre-modern societies with close ties to nature, and employing relativis

Culmination

Needs, Goods and Self-Actualization,ficit. For the purposes of this project, I require a ‘thick vague’ account of the good which identifies core features of human well-being without constraining, through ethnocentric or ideological bias, the forms in which that good is realized. The approach I wish to advance is a eudaimonic fundament

熔巖

Capabilities, Zero-Sum Choices, Equality and Scope,he approach is explicitly universalist (Nussbaum 2001, 5), with Nussbaum committed to an ‘essentialist’ account of ‘the most central features of our common humanity’ (Nussbaum 1992, 215). Physiologically, humans are seen to share intrinsic facets such that ‘The body that labours is in a sense the sa

堅(jiān)毅

What Is Culture? What Does It Do? What , It Do?,uitable for present analytical purposes. The account I develop is fairly sweeping and the examination of the field somewhat cursory. However, consideration of the relationship between the content of culture, its purpose, its association with society and the wholeness of ‘cultures’ suffices to open u

lipids