Titlebook: European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2019; Judicial Power: Safe Ernst Hirsch Ballin,Gerhard van der Schyff,Maarten Book 2020 T.M.C. Asse

TOM

IRATE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-359-7Judicial power; Judicial independence; Judicial safeguards; Judicial limits; Bipolar constitutionalism; D

eulogize

忘川河

Brian Henderson-Sellers,Cesar Gonzalez-Pereznces between international and constitutional judges. Election procedures balance personal independence with institutional accountability, but the supporting European consensus suffers populist threats to human rights protection.

BANAL

A Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network,ountability, the transparency friendly line of case law has creatively been interpreted in a way that now restricts the access right per se. On the whole, the chapter concludes that the CJEU, with all due respect, contributed to the accountability deficit of the EU’s access to documents regime.

一起平行

Thymus

Bipolar Constitutionalism in The Netherlands and Its Consequences for the Independence and Accountabdence of the judiciary in the Netherlands. The conclusion is that in particular the informal safeguards for independence such as the convention of co-optation and the . principle can help to strike a balance between legal protection and democracy.

我沒有命令

Judicial Independence and Accountability in the Council of Europe and the European Court of Human Rinces between international and constitutional judges. Election procedures balance personal independence with institutional accountability, but the supporting European consensus suffers populist threats to human rights protection.

Intellectual

時代錯誤

A Stress Test for Europe’s Judiciarieshought experiments in which the likely effects of adverse developments (such as the ones to be witnessed in some European countries today) should be predicted to identify and remedy weak points in the constitutional and legal framework.