找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws; Marek Zubik,Jan Podkowik,Robert Rybski Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland A

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 42078|回復(fù): 55
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:40:18 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws
編輯Marek Zubik,Jan Podkowik,Robert Rybski
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/317/316746/316746.mp4
概述Presents a unique comparative analysis of all judgments of European constitutional courts as well as the ECJ and ECHR in the matter of Data Retention Law.Offers an interdisciplinary study of data rete
叢書名稱Law, Governance and Technology Series
圖書封面Titlebook: European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws;  Marek Zubik,Jan Podkowik,Robert Rybski Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland A
描述.The book analyses the impact the jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of EU Member States and the Court of Justice of the European Union has had on the perception of freedom of communications in the digital era with respect to these courts’ judgments regarding regulating storage and access to telecommunications data (known as telecommunications data retention) from 2008 to 2017. To do so, it examines the jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of Austria, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Ireland, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, and Slovakia, i.e. those courts that have already ruled on domestic provisions regulating telecommunications data retention. Further, it investigates the judgments of the Court of Justice of European Union regarding directive 2006/24/EC regulating telecommunications data retention along with relevant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. As such, the book provides a comparative study of jurisprudence and national measures to implement the Data Retention Directive...Moreover, the book discusses whether our current understanding of protection of freedom of communications guaranteed by the constitutions of EU member state
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Data Retention; Mass Surveillance Mechanism; Data Retention Directive; Digital Rights Ireland; Privacy; N
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57189-4
isbn_softcover978-3-030-57191-7
isbn_ebook978-3-030-57189-4Series ISSN 2352-1902 Series E-ISSN 2352-1910
issn_series 2352-1902
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws被引頻次




書目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws年度引用




書目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws讀者反饋




書目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:19:32 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:37:38 | 只看該作者
Freedom of Communication and Data Retention in Judgments of the European Court of Human Rightste authorities. Attention was also paid to legal guarantees of freedom of communication, which should assist similar development of surveillance tools. Finally, an attempt was made to forecast in which direction the case law of the Court will follow in the coming years and how the technology develop
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:31:07 | 只看該作者
Data Retention in Cyprus?in the Light of EU Data Retention Lawurt orders allowing access to retained data even after a more recent CJEU judgement in which a general and indiscriminate data retention obligation has explicitly been stated to be incompatible with the EU Charter. The chapter finishes with a discussion on the?possible practical effects of the 2018
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:39:05 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:58:40 | 只看該作者
Data Retention in Germanystion to what extent the legislator may impose obligations on telecommunications service companies, among others on anonymisation services. This chapter explains how the DRD was implemented in Germany, describes the proceedings before the FCC and analyses its judgment in detail, together with a numb
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:49:48 | 只看該作者
Data Retention in Irelandfeguards, including prior review by a court or independent administrative authority. This judgment, which is now under appeal?and the subject of a reference to the Court of Justice, illustrates many of the very real challenges arising from the Court of Justice’s jurisprudence in this field. Yet, for
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:31:52 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:02:54 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:30:03 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 11:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
新乐市| 福州市| 新建县| 万州区| 乌拉特前旗| 昭通市| 五河县| 邵阳市| 大悟县| 上栗县| 黔江区| 绥江县| 德格县| 延川县| 盐津县| 华坪县| 聂拉木县| 商南县| 阳东县| 蕲春县| 寿阳县| 永和县| 平度市| 珠海市| 原阳县| 义马市| 阿拉善右旗| 鸡西市| 永春县| 托克托县| 丰原市| 肇源县| 寿阳县| 鱼台县| 莆田市| 随州市| 麦盖提县| 临沭县| 桐梓县| 杭州市| 民乐县|