找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws; Marek Zubik,Jan Podkowik,Robert Rybski Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland A

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 42079|回復(fù): 55
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:40:18 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws
編輯Marek Zubik,Jan Podkowik,Robert Rybski
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/317/316746/316746.mp4
概述Presents a unique comparative analysis of all judgments of European constitutional courts as well as the ECJ and ECHR in the matter of Data Retention Law.Offers an interdisciplinary study of data rete
叢書(shū)名稱Law, Governance and Technology Series
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws;  Marek Zubik,Jan Podkowik,Robert Rybski Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland A
描述.The book analyses the impact the jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of EU Member States and the Court of Justice of the European Union has had on the perception of freedom of communications in the digital era with respect to these courts’ judgments regarding regulating storage and access to telecommunications data (known as telecommunications data retention) from 2008 to 2017. To do so, it examines the jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of Austria, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Ireland, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, and Slovakia, i.e. those courts that have already ruled on domestic provisions regulating telecommunications data retention. Further, it investigates the judgments of the Court of Justice of European Union regarding directive 2006/24/EC regulating telecommunications data retention along with relevant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. As such, the book provides a comparative study of jurisprudence and national measures to implement the Data Retention Directive...Moreover, the book discusses whether our current understanding of protection of freedom of communications guaranteed by the constitutions of EU member state
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Data Retention; Mass Surveillance Mechanism; Data Retention Directive; Digital Rights Ireland; Privacy; N
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57189-4
isbn_softcover978-3-030-57191-7
isbn_ebook978-3-030-57189-4Series ISSN 2352-1902 Series E-ISSN 2352-1910
issn_series 2352-1902
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws年度引用




書(shū)目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:19:32 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:37:38 | 只看該作者
Freedom of Communication and Data Retention in Judgments of the European Court of Human Rightste authorities. Attention was also paid to legal guarantees of freedom of communication, which should assist similar development of surveillance tools. Finally, an attempt was made to forecast in which direction the case law of the Court will follow in the coming years and how the technology develop
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:31:07 | 只看該作者
Data Retention in Cyprus?in the Light of EU Data Retention Lawurt orders allowing access to retained data even after a more recent CJEU judgement in which a general and indiscriminate data retention obligation has explicitly been stated to be incompatible with the EU Charter. The chapter finishes with a discussion on the?possible practical effects of the 2018
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:39:05 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:58:40 | 只看該作者
Data Retention in Germanystion to what extent the legislator may impose obligations on telecommunications service companies, among others on anonymisation services. This chapter explains how the DRD was implemented in Germany, describes the proceedings before the FCC and analyses its judgment in detail, together with a numb
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:49:48 | 只看該作者
Data Retention in Irelandfeguards, including prior review by a court or independent administrative authority. This judgment, which is now under appeal?and the subject of a reference to the Court of Justice, illustrates many of the very real challenges arising from the Court of Justice’s jurisprudence in this field. Yet, for
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:31:52 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:02:54 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:30:03 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 13:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
诏安县| 根河市| 丹寨县| 西充县| 砚山县| 襄城县| 海淀区| 澄江县| 龙山县| 宁陕县| 皮山县| 神木县| 常山县| 龙川县| 常德市| 襄樊市| 恩施市| 武穴市| 泰宁县| 邵阳县| 邵武市| 乐东| 稻城县| 新安县| 甘南县| 英吉沙县| 贵阳市| 济阳县| 辽阳县| 弥渡县| 涿鹿县| 清原| 绥江县| 沁源县| 炉霍县| 淄博市| 甘孜县| 若尔盖县| 板桥市| 五莲县| 达州市|