找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity; Joseph Andrew Bjelde,David Merry,Christopher Roser Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Arg

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 可怖
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:11:51 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49532-3ies about whether . actually does possess such (persuasive) strength are voiced: the weakness, not the power, of . comes to occupy center stage. Gorgias’ own views thus are likely more complex than Plato allows.
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:49:21 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3052-0of collection may be ‘purified’ of its empirical origins in its dialectical application to the inquiry into forms. In addition to providing a unifying thread from Socratic to Platonic and, finally, Aristotelian ., this view also offers evidence for the consistency of dialectical methodology within the dialogues
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 07:33:44 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61548-6oxa play at least a co-starring role. But in the third section, I argue that endoxa don’t play that co-starring role, by arguing for a deflationary account of what endoxa are. For that reason, the third view emerges as the most plausible; but the third view is, I’ll suggest, Platonic.
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:15:28 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 15:00:38 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 20:43:38 | 只看該作者
Complications of Cold Injuries,s such as argumentation schemes, types of dialogue, critical questions and a dialectical concept of burden of proof. Disputed issues on how the . fits the standard dialogue typology are discussed, and it is concluded that it fits best into a type of dialogue called examination dialogue that is closely related to persuasion dialogue.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 00:36:18 | 只看該作者
Argumentation and Persuasion in Classical Chinese Literature,und against which such techniques developed among so called “wandering persuaders” (.), who were travelling from court to court to offer their services as political advisors and diplomats to the local rulers of the time.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 04:05:07 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 07:45:20 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 13:38:02 | 只看該作者
1566-7650 excellent resource on how ancient thinkers argue and think a.This book provides a collection of essays representing the state of the art in the?research into argumentation in classical antiquity. It contains essays from leading and up and coming scholars on figures as diverse as Parmenides, Gorgias,
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 21:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
禄丰县| 新津县| 波密县| 色达县| 虎林市| 四会市| 呼图壁县| 郑州市| 顺昌县| 南昌市| 洞头县| 南开区| 朝阳区| 洛南县| 嘉祥县| 侯马市| 永泰县| 天津市| 黑龙江省| 河西区| 新沂市| 永嘉县| 井冈山市| 隆尧县| 新乡市| 乌兰浩特市| 嘉定区| 布尔津县| 西丰县| 松滋市| 阿瓦提县| 广丰县| 松桃| 常宁市| 屯门区| 惠安县| 元谋县| 长子县| 巢湖市| 资兴市| 柯坪县|