找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪(fǎng)問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity; Joseph Andrew Bjelde,David Merry,Christopher Roser Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Arg

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 34326|回復(fù): 52
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:49:58 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity
編輯Joseph Andrew Bjelde,David Merry,Christopher Roser
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/316/315297/315297.mp4
概述Covers a broad range of ancient perspectives on argumentation.Combines approaches from argumentation theory and history of philosophy.Is an excellent resource on how ancient thinkers argue and think a
叢書(shū)名稱(chēng)Argumentation Library
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity;  Joseph Andrew Bjelde,David Merry,Christopher Roser Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Arg
描述.This book provides a collection of essays representing the state of the art in the?research into argumentation in classical antiquity. It contains essays from leading and up and coming scholars on figures as diverse as Parmenides, Gorgias, Seneca, and Classical Chinese "wandering persuaders."?.The book includes contributions from specialists in the history of philosophy as well as specialists in contemporary argumentation theory, and stimulates the dialogue between scholars studying issues relating to argumentation theory in ancient philosophy and contemporary argumentation theorists. Furthermore, the book sets the direction for research into argumentation in antiquity by encouraging an engagement with a broader range of historical figures, and closer collaboration between contemporary concerns and the history of philosophy..
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Argumentation Ancient Philosophy; Ancient Rhetoric; Ancient Logic; Dialectic Ancient Philosophy; Rhetori
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70817-7
isbn_softcover978-3-030-70819-1
isbn_ebook978-3-030-70817-7Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907
issn_series 1566-7650
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:14:52 | 只看該作者
,Seneca’s Argumentation and Moral Intuitionism,Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues that moral disagreement and widespread moral bias pose a serious problem for moral intuitionism. Seneca’s view that we just recognise the good could be criticised using a similar argument. His approach to argumentation offers a way out, one that may serve as a model for a revisionary intuitionism.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:05:40 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:09:21 | 只看該作者
Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity978-3-030-70817-7Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:47:28 | 只看該作者
Britain and the Origins of the Cold Wareek tradition. This chapter focuses on the central section of his poem (fr. 8 DK) and examines the form of its argumentation: its use of indirect proof, the articulation of its reasoning, and the role necessity plays in it.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:39:43 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:04:58 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:51:25 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:38:55 | 只看該作者
,Platonic βραχυλογ?α and Aristotle on Say-What-You-Believe,d(s) and/or therapeutic aims from those of sophistic and eristic questioners. The treatment of SWYB in Aristotle’s . and . (.), however, challenges the notion that SWYB would have distinguished Socrates in the eyes of Plato’s earliest readers.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:42:16 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 21:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
巫山县| 绩溪县| 富平县| 会东县| 聊城市| 南昌市| 娄底市| 通海县| 澄江县| 筠连县| 尤溪县| 古交市| 博乐市| 大兴区| 梁河县| 牡丹江市| 台东县| 饶平县| 佳木斯市| 密云县| 通山县| 晋州市| 崇仁县| 吴堡县| 五大连池市| 金塔县| 义乌市| 江安县| 澎湖县| 枣强县| 大同县| 昆山市| 焦作市| 定陶县| 修文县| 合阳县| 汉阴县| 邢台县| 彭阳县| 南岸区| 永安市|