Titlebook: Erasmus; Intellectual of the Nathan Ron Book 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Turkophobi

Localized

書目名稱Erasmus影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Erasmus影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Erasmus網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Erasmus網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Erasmus被引頻次




書目名稱Erasmus被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Erasmus年度引用




書目名稱Erasmus年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Erasmus讀者反饋




書目名稱Erasmus讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

細(xì)查

Culpable

An Intellectual Against Crusading,ect on the figure of the modern public intellectual. Erasmus’s critical and non-conventional thinking is demonstrated, first and foremost, in the promotion of the public good, and closely linked to this was the raising of a clear and consistent voice against crusades. Indeed, Erasmus never ruled out

LEVER

Erasmus on the Education and Nature of Women,llowing Thomas More’s successful teaching experience with his daughters—a significant change took place in his educational thought, namely the recognition that women are capable of learning, whether literary or religious studies. Furthermore, he now raised a voice to enhance their education. Apparen

intrigue

In the Face of the Execution of Thomas More,ther devotees expected an appropriate response from Erasmus. According to Damian, Erasmus was too silent about More. Thomas Cromwell saw to it that Erasmus received his income. The shrewd political operator may have thought it wise to keep the aged scholar in good humor lest he should rouse European

溫室

,In the Face of Francis I’s Foreign policy,pean kings of his era, and even praised the glory won by Francis I on the battlefield of Marignano (1515). In a letter to Jean Grolier de Servières, Erasmus expresses his satisfaction with Francis’s victory in Italy and praises him for his recent victory and the conquering of Milan. Grolier was the

溫室

In the Face of the Destruction of the Amerindians,y in 1516. He dispatched it to Adrian Florenz, the future Pope. Apparently, Adrian passed the essay to Erasmus, who was councilor for Charles. But even if Erasmus did not receive it directly from Adrian, given that Las Casas was spreading the news it is improbable that Erasmus did not know about it.

Opponent

,Erasmus’s Turkophobic Bias, cultures. Certain proclamations won Erasmus the name of a devoted cosmopolitan. Pacifism has also been ascribed to him. Johan Huizinga glorified what he defined as “truly Erasmian,” namely, “gentleness, kindliness, moderation, a generally diffused moderate erudition.” Unsurprisingly, such an eulogy

有組織

Erasmus and Reuchlin: The Jews and their Language,Reuchlin was unique in his sympathetic approach to the Jews and to their literary and cultural heritage. However, such a spotlight can facilitate a distinctive observation of Erasmus and a sharper comprehension of his prejudices concerning the Jews, their language and books—as much as to convince us

Hdl348

Conclusions: Only Sparks Fly Upward,yed a relatively tolerant attitude toward heretics, which had a considerable influence on Sebastian Castellio and other protagonists of the struggle for religious toleration, it was Reuchlin who dared to struggle for a (proto) freedom of religion for non-Christians, namely the Jews; the same Jews wh