Titlebook: Epistemic Pluralism; Annalisa Coliva,Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

Nutraceutical

書目名稱Epistemic Pluralism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Epistemic Pluralism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Pluralism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Epistemic Pluralism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Pluralism被引頻次




書目名稱Epistemic Pluralism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Pluralism年度引用




書目名稱Epistemic Pluralism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Pluralism讀者反饋




書目名稱Epistemic Pluralism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

策略

收藏品

Onerous

How to Be a Pluralist About Self-Knowledgedorses constitutivism with respect to first-personal self-knowledge and defends it from the . devastating objection of rendering it a misnomer to call that kind of self-. thus. Moreover, it embraces methodological pluralism with respect to third-personal self-knowledge and draws attention to the epi

Debark

改正

2946-2851 nt, self-knowledge and the status of philosophical disputes about ontology) this fascinating new volume is essential reading for scholars, researchers and advanced students in the discipline..978-3-319-88034-1978-3-319-65460-7Series ISSN 2946-2851 Series E-ISSN 2946-286X

改正

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7936-9 do two things. First, I explain why the distinction between epistemic monism and epistemic pluralism is most interestingly drawn at the level of non-derivative epistemic goods. Second, I make the observation that, at a very fundamental level, the varieties of epistemic pluralism presented in Sect.?

ERUPT

–吃

L. Szilágyi,S. M. Szilágyi,Z. Benyóhe locality of rational evaluation (in conjunction with a reasonable appreciation of epistemic diversity) commits the Wittgenstenian to a further epistemic incommensurability thesis. Next, Duncan Pritchard’s (e.g. 2009; 2015) novel attempt to save the hinge epistemologist from a commitment to episte

MITE

Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Controldorses constitutivism with respect to first-personal self-knowledge and defends it from the . devastating objection of rendering it a misnomer to call that kind of self-. thus. Moreover, it embraces methodological pluralism with respect to third-personal self-knowledge and draws attention to the epi