找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Epistemic Logic and the Theory of Games and Decisions; Michael Bacharach (Professor of Economics and Dire Book 1997 Kluwer Academic Publis

[復制鏈接]
樓主: proptosis
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 17:55:53 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 20:17:28 | 只看該作者
Daizhan Cheng,Hongsheng Qi,Zhiqiang Li any game the strategies that might be chosen by rational and intelligent players who know the structure of the game, and who recognize each other’s rationality and knowledge. The problem was not to find the set of strategies that satisfied some independent characterization of rationality and intell
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 00:08:09 | 只看該作者
Series and Integral Representations,owing an equally well-received (albeit questionable) view, a known event must be true. Hence the standard definition of . (CK), as perhaps first introduced by Lewis (1969) and as formalized in Aumann’s (1976) classic paper: an event is said to be CK if it is true, every individual in the group knows it, etc.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 03:49:30 | 只看該作者
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 07:55:53 | 只看該作者
On the Logic of Common Belief and Common Knowledgeowing an equally well-received (albeit questionable) view, a known event must be true. Hence the standard definition of . (CK), as perhaps first introduced by Lewis (1969) and as formalized in Aumann’s (1976) classic paper: an event is said to be CK if it is true, every individual in the group knows it, etc.
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 12:25:54 | 只看該作者
Synchronic Information, Knowledge and Common Knowledge in Extensive Games is her turn to move, etc. It is not, however, a sufficiently rich language in the sense that there are meaningful and natural statements that one can make (about a given extensive game) whose truth cannot be decided without making the language richer. We shall give two examples. Consider first the extensive form of Figure 1.
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 16:45:40 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 21:07:20 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1139-3agents; bounded rationality; decision theory; economics; game theory; knowledge; reason
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 02:50:23 | 只看該作者
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 06:31:51 | 只看該作者
Epistemic Logic and the Theory of Games and Decisions978-1-4613-1139-3Series ISSN 0924-6126 Series E-ISSN 2194-3044
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 17:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
东辽县| 咸阳市| 黄浦区| 鄯善县| 涡阳县| 三亚市| 新巴尔虎左旗| 阆中市| 余干县| 黄浦区| 英德市| 分宜县| 临颍县| 三河市| 双鸭山市| 安福县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 东丰县| 新津县| 柘荣县| 新丰县| 黄浦区| 石棉县| 和林格尔县| 竹溪县| 胶州市| 刚察县| 江阴市| 宽甸| 无锡市| 清流县| 南宁市| 乐安县| 广南县| 灌南县| 延边| 仙居县| 东丽区| 瓮安县| 比如县| 平和县|