找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Epistemic Entitlement; The Right to Believe Hannes Ole Matthiessen Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 自由才謹慎
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:43:08 | 只看該作者
Kontext und Gegenstand der Untersuchung,ally, however, it has been more common to talk of positive epistemic properties as . instead of .. In the following section, I argue that it makes more sense, in general, to regard . as the primary bearers of epistemic status.
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:56:50 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88579-1ptual situation is the . for an entitlement: once you are in such a position you have a right to believe (and others have the right to attribute an entitlement to you) without providing justification, unless a . is indicated.
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:48:26 | 只看該作者
The Right to Believe,ally, however, it has been more common to talk of positive epistemic properties as . instead of .. In the following section, I argue that it makes more sense, in general, to regard . as the primary bearers of epistemic status.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:35:31 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:36:19 | 只看該作者
A Default and Challenge Model of Perceptual Entitlement,fulfilling default conditions, the subject is not required to justify her belief in order to be entitled to it. So the default conditions are first and foremost conditions for being non-accidentally entitled.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:19:24 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:49:54 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:40:11 | 只看該作者
The Social Character of Entitlements,general argument to the effect that entitlement should not be viewed as an epistemic status that is grounded in an internalist condition. The argument rests on the idea that epistemic rights — like other rights — provide presumptive criteria for how one ought to be treated by others, based on factor
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 22:57:55 | 只看該作者
Perceptual Knowledge and the First-Person Perspective,en enables us to form beliefs that are, in a strong sense, incorrigible. In perceiving that p we have, as a matter of fact, an indefeasible warrant at our disposal. In contrast to belief based on evidence (where we often form a belief on non-deductive grounds), perceiving that p . of whether p, elim
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:15:13 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6959-0 shopping list, checking to see whether it is complete. Have we still got onions? I don’t know. I ask my girlfriend; she also doesn’t know. She opens the cupboard, takes a look inside and says, ‘There are still plenty. No need to buy onions today.’ Now we both know that there are plenty of onions and that there is no need to buy any at the market.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-27 01:21
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
黄冈市| 略阳县| 遂川县| 宿迁市| 文登市| 广宗县| 北安市| 镇坪县| 虹口区| 龙州县| 中西区| 叙永县| 黔西县| 白玉县| 广水市| 青浦区| 弥渡县| 许昌县| 涪陵区| 怀宁县| 汽车| 裕民县| 个旧市| 昌邑市| 东丰县| 隆林| 湖南省| 宾川县| 库尔勒市| 精河县| 罗山县| 塘沽区| 华安县| 三穗县| 西安市| 迁安市| 曲周县| 张北县| 深泽县| 松溪县| 任丘市|