找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Elicitation of Preferences; Baruch Fischhoff,Charles F. Manski Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000 behavior.calculus.h

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 6592|回復(fù): 46
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:13:44 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences
編輯Baruch Fischhoff,Charles F. Manski
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/308/307679/307679.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Elicitation of Preferences;  Baruch Fischhoff,Charles F. Manski Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000 behavior.calculus.h
描述Economists and psychologists have, on the whole, exhibitedsharply different perspectives on the elicitation of preferences.Economists, who have made preference the central primitive in theirthinking about human behavior, have for the most part rejectedelicitation and have instead sought to infer preferences fromobservations of choice behavior. Psychologists, who have tended tothink of preference as a context-determined subjective construct, haveembraced elicitation as their dominant approach to measurement. .This volume, based on a symposium organized by Daniel McFadden at theUniversity of California at Berkeley, provides a provocative andconstructive engagement between economists and psychologists on theelicitation of preferences.
出版日期Book 2000
關(guān)鍵詞behavior; calculus; human behavior; linear optimization; production
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8
isbn_softcover978-90-481-5776-1
isbn_ebook978-94-017-1406-8
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media New York 2000
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences被引頻次




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences年度引用




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences讀者反饋




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:16:31 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:06:56 | 只看該作者
978-90-481-5776-1Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:39:21 | 只看該作者
C. Paul Hallwood,Thomas J. Miceli . the central primitive in their thinking about human behavior, have for the most part rejected elicitation and have instead sought to infer preferences from observations of choice behavior. Psychologists, who have tended to think of preference as a context-determined subjective construct, have emb
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:24:13 | 只看該作者
Positive Psychology and Well-Being at Sea,nce is usually reduced by higher payment). Higher incentive does improve performance often, typically judgment tasks that are responsive to better effort. Incentives also reduce “presentation” effects (e.g., generosity and risk-seeking). Incentive effects are comparable to effects of other variables
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:56:38 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:12:52 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:46:08 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05273-7tatus of individuals and households. In particular the use of brackets to elicit information about income and assets in surveys of households can interact with acquiescence bias and anchoring to cause bias in the estimates of the distributions of income and assets. This paper uses data from the Heal
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:35:46 | 只看該作者
evaluation is being made. With stylized experimental or survey choices, researchers’ challenge is typically identifying the features that people add in order to make their task real enough to answer (i.e., how they read between the lines). With rich “real world” choices, researchers’ challenge is ty
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:16:58 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 09:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
淮南市| 梓潼县| 闻喜县| 偃师市| 黄冈市| 文昌市| 浦县| 天峨县| 永泰县| 利川市| 新余市| 舒城县| 安丘市| 吴江市| 赞皇县| 壤塘县| 肇源县| 新乐市| 纳雍县| 金山区| 剑川县| 岢岚县| 贵定县| 栾城县| 安达市| 万盛区| 黄大仙区| 贡嘎县| 正宁县| 大港区| 响水县| 定襄县| 遵化市| 保德县| 宽城| 南京市| 嘉义县| 略阳县| 水富县| 淮滨县| 天等县|