找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Elicitation of Preferences; Baruch Fischhoff,Charles F. Manski Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000 behavior.calculus.h

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 6595|回復(fù): 46
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:13:44 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences
編輯Baruch Fischhoff,Charles F. Manski
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/308/307679/307679.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Elicitation of Preferences;  Baruch Fischhoff,Charles F. Manski Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000 behavior.calculus.h
描述Economists and psychologists have, on the whole, exhibitedsharply different perspectives on the elicitation of preferences.Economists, who have made preference the central primitive in theirthinking about human behavior, have for the most part rejectedelicitation and have instead sought to infer preferences fromobservations of choice behavior. Psychologists, who have tended tothink of preference as a context-determined subjective construct, haveembraced elicitation as their dominant approach to measurement. .This volume, based on a symposium organized by Daniel McFadden at theUniversity of California at Berkeley, provides a provocative andconstructive engagement between economists and psychologists on theelicitation of preferences.
出版日期Book 2000
關(guān)鍵詞behavior; calculus; human behavior; linear optimization; production
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8
isbn_softcover978-90-481-5776-1
isbn_ebook978-94-017-1406-8
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media New York 2000
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences被引頻次




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences年度引用




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences讀者反饋




書目名稱Elicitation of Preferences讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:16:31 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:06:56 | 只看該作者
978-90-481-5776-1Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:39:21 | 只看該作者
C. Paul Hallwood,Thomas J. Miceli . the central primitive in their thinking about human behavior, have for the most part rejected elicitation and have instead sought to infer preferences from observations of choice behavior. Psychologists, who have tended to think of preference as a context-determined subjective construct, have emb
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:24:13 | 只看該作者
Positive Psychology and Well-Being at Sea,nce is usually reduced by higher payment). Higher incentive does improve performance often, typically judgment tasks that are responsive to better effort. Incentives also reduce “presentation” effects (e.g., generosity and risk-seeking). Incentive effects are comparable to effects of other variables
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:56:38 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:12:52 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:46:08 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05273-7tatus of individuals and households. In particular the use of brackets to elicit information about income and assets in surveys of households can interact with acquiescence bias and anchoring to cause bias in the estimates of the distributions of income and assets. This paper uses data from the Heal
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:35:46 | 只看該作者
evaluation is being made. With stylized experimental or survey choices, researchers’ challenge is typically identifying the features that people add in order to make their task real enough to answer (i.e., how they read between the lines). With rich “real world” choices, researchers’ challenge is ty
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:16:58 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 13:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
绥宁县| 阳朔县| 梓潼县| 长武县| 屏山县| 赣榆县| 宾川县| 奉贤区| 托克逊县| 聂拉木县| 广饶县| 广饶县| 闵行区| 高淳县| 余庆县| 富锦市| 庆安县| 娄底市| 依安县| 惠州市| 莒南县| 仁布县| 镇坪县| 新化县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 巢湖市| 虎林市| 高平市| 大荔县| 松溪县| 高清| 康定县| 翁牛特旗| 申扎县| 岳阳市| 西林县| 河西区| 石楼县| 大丰市| 建平县| 仙游县|