Titlebook: Eighteenth-Century Literary Affections; Louise Joy Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 affect.history of emotio

二足動(dòng)物

書(shū)目名稱Eighteenth-Century Literary Affections影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Eighteenth-Century Literary Affections影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Eighteenth-Century Literary Affections網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Eighteenth-Century Literary Affections網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Eighteenth-Century Literary Affections被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Eighteenth-Century Literary Affections被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Eighteenth-Century Literary Affections年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Eighteenth-Century Literary Affections年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Eighteenth-Century Literary Affections讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Eighteenth-Century Literary Affections讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

grudging

心神不寧

意外

Novel Feelings The obstacle that both struggled to overcome is that the object of philosophical enquiry is emotions as they are presented externally (objective emotions), which ignores, or even denies, the relevance of emotions as they are experienced internally (subjective feelings). The discussion explores how

Commentary

Translated Emotionsholds conservative standards of feminine morality. When Williams translates Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s . and Bernardin de Saint-Pierre’s ., her overhaul of the categories of emotions that these works handle significantly alters the gender paradigms that they put forward. This chapter shows that William

燈絲

燈絲

繁殖

Negotiate

多嘴

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00284-1ions), which ignores, or even denies, the relevance of emotions as they are experienced internally (subjective feelings). The discussion explores how both writers lit upon the novel as a vehicle that afforded new possibilities for playing out their philosophical puzzlings about the proper place of the emotions.