Titlebook: Economic Sanctions and Presidential Decisions; Models of Political A. Cooper Drury Book 2005 A. Cooper Drury 2005 assessment.database.data

GIDDY

Stettiner Haff und Kaiserfahrt,s that the executive must make with regard to the use of economic coercion. First, sanctions must be initiated against a target. Second, once sanctions are in place, the president must decide whether to lift, decrease, maintain, or increase them. It is in this chapter that I test the decision to ini

貴族

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-39429-8 economic coercion. Diagnostic tests also showed that the models were consistent across individual targets/countries. However, it is still possible that the president is systematically more likely to sanction a type of country. There are three types of countries/targets that have the potential to in

Latency

incubus

Andreas Eisele,Simon Sagmeisternd cognitive constraints do play a part in the president’s decision. In almost every estimation of the theoretical models, the tension level between the United States and the target/country had the biggest, positive impact on the likelihood that the White House would initiate economic coercion. The

摻假

Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse,nger an interesting question because sanctions simply do not work. Instead, other unanswered questions concerning economic coercion should be investigated. In this book, I have investigated and attempted to answer some of these questions, specifically: the decisions to initiate and modify a sanction

種族被根除

Advances in Foreign Policy Analysishttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/301793.jpg

bizarre

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403976956assessment; database; databases; decision theory; foreign policy

博愛家

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-94454-3Before turning to the task of defining what constitutes an economic sanction, I first indicate what is . an economic sanction by contrasting economic coercion with economic incentives. I then turn to a discussion of the instruments and then goals of economic coercion.

認識

Economic Coercion in Theory and Practice,Before turning to the task of defining what constitutes an economic sanction, I first indicate what is . an economic sanction by contrasting economic coercion with economic incentives. I then turn to a discussion of the instruments and then goals of economic coercion.

mechanical

Stettiner Haff und Kaiserfahrt, factors, and cognitive constraints in the three models; three control variables are also included. Because some of the data sources cover different periods, two different data sets are compiled. One begins in January 1966 and ends in December 1992. The other begins in January 1991 and ends in December 2000.