Titlebook: Dignity and the Organization; Monika Kostera,Michael Pirson Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 humanistic.mana

側面上下

書目名稱Dignity and the Organization影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Dignity and the Organization影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Dignity and the Organization網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Dignity and the Organization網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Dignity and the Organization被引頻次




書目名稱Dignity and the Organization被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Dignity and the Organization年度引用




書目名稱Dignity and the Organization年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Dignity and the Organization讀者反饋




書目名稱Dignity and the Organization讀者反饋學科排名

提升

intimate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41091-9nd the stakeholder approach and propose the ISCT as a valid approach to integrate the discussion about human dignity at the level of the firm in an attempt to reconnect firms’ objectives with the interest of society.

為現(xiàn)場

Empirische Befunde zu sozialer Ungleichheite focusing tightly on a key aspect of the working conditions these professionals experience: namely, control of their work process and its impact on dignity at work. The chapter concludes by discussing the implications of using Marx’s theory of alienation to research and oppose dignity-denying work.

Mirage

Obliterate

Introduction to Dignity and Organization,al and organizational science. The humanistic management perspective also questions one of the prevailing, paradigmatic pillars of what we organize for, by suggesting that the aim of organizing should be a contribution to the common good, or the creation of well-being. This aim contrasts with one of

Obliterate

Gratulate

Marx, Alienation and the Denial of Dignity of Work,e focusing tightly on a key aspect of the working conditions these professionals experience: namely, control of their work process and its impact on dignity at work. The chapter concludes by discussing the implications of using Marx’s theory of alienation to research and oppose dignity-denying work.

陶器

ascetic