Titlebook: Difficulty in Poetry; A Stylistic Model Davide Castiglione Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 stylistics of poe

Bone-Scan

Collar

978-3-030-07283-4The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019

Facilities

Teresa Rodríguez de las Heras Ballell. It does so by addressing the general reader and by reporting some anecdotal evidence in a lively manner. It draws attention to the fact that the perception of difficulty is both widespread and fundamental, and so it needs to be tackled holistically. The stylistic and cognitive model developed and

GULF

無(wú)辜

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25694-3 the frameworks underpinning the model. In general, an empirical and scientific method is advocated. As difficulty is a function of a poem’s textuality, stylistics is the discipline better suited to investigate it. Within or around stylistics, foregrounding theory filters out salient features, while

彎腰

運(yùn)氣

Bolanle O. Dahunsi,Lucy E. Dunne authors are: Gertrude Stein, Ezra Pound, Wallace Stevens, E.E. Cummings, Hart Crane, Dylan Thomas, Geoffrey Hill, Susan Howe and Charles Bernstein for difficulty; two poems by Mark Strand and John Betjeman provide instead a baseline measure for accessibility. The second part of the chapter outlines

tattle

Initiative

表否定

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94016-4issions of helplessness, acknowledgments of iconic chaos or nonsensicality, very erratic interpretations. Besides intensifying some of the challenges common in the typology of transient difficulty, they undermine interpretability itself by renouncing or deconstructing textual schemas. This shows in