Titlebook: Dentine Hypersensitivity; Advances in Diagnosi David G. Gillam Book 20151st edition Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Aeti

煞費(fèi)苦心

Aetiology and Clinical Features of Dentine Hypersensitivity,gical processes in particular tooth wear often resulted in elusive treatment and preventive strategies which focused on the symptoms of DH rather than its cause/s. Nevertheless, our understanding of the condition is somewhat clearer today. This chapter therefore focuses attention on the clinical fea

ERUPT

Advances in In Vitro Testing Techniques for Dentine Hypersensitivity, definitions of DH and root sensitivity (RS), we may discuss DH in the following manner: (1) a . dentine hypersensitivity (DH) when (cervical) dentine surface is exposed as a consequence of enamel erosion and abrasion and after appearance of gingival recession and retraction and (2) a . dentine hype

Cerumen

Intentional

獸群

元音

Future Strategies for the Development of Desensitising Products,terials as an alternative to the traditional desensitising products for treating DH, inhibiting caries and promoting remineralisation. The present chapter will focus attention on the physical and chemical properties of both traditional and novel products recommended for the treatment of DH as well a

Inveterate

典型

Book 20151st editionormulated to resolve the problem. There continues to be under-reporting of the condition by clinicians and uncertainty over aetiology, diagnosis and effective management. This book will hopefully contribute in combating these deficiencies and assist the clinician in delivering optimal patient care.

昆蟲

Paul Turner,Glyn Volans,Heather Wisemannction of intradental nerves. Conversely, healing processes within the tooth and desensitizing therapies can target both dentin and nerve function, with the goal of reducing stimulus-evoked activation. By approaching the problem from the anatomic, physiological, and molecular perspective, we hope to

Gingivitis

Paul Turner,Glyn Volans,Heather Wisemand a severe problem (Gillam et al., 2002). A recent review on the burden of DH by Cunha-Cruz and Wataha (2014) from the published studies in the literature would appear to suggest that the best estimate of the prevalence of DH is 10 % with an average of 33 % across the studies. The question as to whe