Titlebook: Democratizing Public Management; Towards Practice-Bas Marta Struminska-Kutra Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018

富裕

書目名稱Democratizing Public Management影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Democratizing Public Management影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Democratizing Public Management網絡公開度




書目名稱Democratizing Public Management網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Democratizing Public Management被引頻次




書目名稱Democratizing Public Management被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Democratizing Public Management年度引用




書目名稱Democratizing Public Management年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Democratizing Public Management讀者反饋




書目名稱Democratizing Public Management讀者反饋學科排名

FLASK

http://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/265270.jpg

deceive

軌道

Global Policy Responses: A Snapshotir ability to learn and to critically reflect upon goals and the means by which to achieve them. The author proposes to regard the phenomenon of the governance turn through the lens of metagovernance and organizational learning concepts as, taken together, they allow us to capture the multilevel str

OREX

Enterprise Digital Transformationtitutional change. This framework, grounded in institutional perspective, may be at least as useful for academics and practitioners as the formal framework revealing different ideal types of learning and different governance modes. The latter is important when thinking about designing organizational

climax

Data Connectivity and Digital Infrastructureta three frames are distinguished: a legalist frame organizing the perception of participation around legal rules and procedures, a managerialist frame using private sector-inspired rhetoric, and a frame of representative democracy attributing responsibility for decision-making and problem-solving t

climax

Global Policy Responses: A Snapshotalization and learning of new governance patterns. The analysis illustrates that even in the face of complex problems and public pressure for inclusion of external stakeholders, the shift from government to governance is neither obvious nor necessary. As the old, hierarchical ways remain the default

只有

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54494-2the city, how it found its way through the established ways of thinking and acting, eventually becoming part of formal regulations at the city level. Initially,?governance as an approach to public management was used above all instrumentally. Yet, even such ‘fake’ learning resulted in institutional

ABASH

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54494-2 and organizational learning. These perspectives are used to make sense out of empirical material. The author searches for significant differences between the cases. Why were public officials able to critically reflect on their practices and eventually change the way of governing in some cases, and

anarchist

Sebastian Pranz,Marlis Prinzingearch embedded in modernist-empiricist perspective, extrapolation-based case study guided by interpretive accounts of governance and public management, and action research rooted in pragmatist methodology. Each one is based on different premises about theory-practice relationship, and more broadly a