Titlebook: Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia; Rahime ?okay Nebio?lu Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusi

期滿

Conclusion: Contemporary Dystopia as an Art of the Possible, As a continuation and a summary of the previous chapters, the author extends this discussion to a larger corpus of contemporary works from different literary traditions such as William Gibson’s . (2003), Max Barry’s . (2003), Dave Eggers’s . (2013), Cindy Pon’s . (2017) and Tahsin Yücel’s . [.] (2006).

FACET

吹氣

s of transgressive and immanent dystopia within the conceptu.This book offers an insightful history of dystopian literature, integrating it within the conceptual schemas of Deleuze and Guattari. Unlike earlier examples of dystopia which depict representations of a possible future that is remarkably

Demonstrate

禁止

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17047-9the possibility?of creating?revolutionary moments?out of this encounter. In defining and describing this productive encounter and its?consequences, the author also provides textual evidence, which?simultaneously testifies to the correlations between the clinical and critical approach, and the schizoanalysis discussed in the previous chapters.

內(nèi)向者

Lehrstile im ?international classroom‘ As a continuation and a summary of the previous chapters, the author extends this discussion to a larger corpus of contemporary works from different literary traditions such as William Gibson’s . (2003), Max Barry’s . (2003), Dave Eggers’s . (2013), Cindy Pon’s . (2017) and Tahsin Yücel’s . [.] (2006).

LURE

衍生

榮幸

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83647-2or literature in contemporary dystopia and discussing the role of dystopian writers as symptomatologists who not only point at the dystopian sicknesses of today’s societies under late capitalist control but also offer positive cures for these sicknesses.

牛的細(xì)微差別