Titlebook: Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia; Rahime ?okay Nebio?lu Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusi

可入到

書目名稱Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia被引頻次




書目名稱Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia年度引用




書目名稱Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia讀者反饋




書目名稱Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Dystopia讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

歌曲

射手座

遠(yuǎn)地點(diǎn)

Foreshadow

Schizoanalysis of Contemporary Dystopia,re is innately highly productive and functions as the vessel of life and yet it is very repressed and regulated under false premises. The author sets out to interrogate why and how desire is targeted and encaptured within and by the late capitalist system, and to show how different treatments of des

躺下殘殺

,The Immanence of the New Weird: China Miéville’s ,he conception of immanent dystopia the author proposes. The analyses mostly revolve around the idea of hybridity, a notion which not only defines the narrative structure of the novel but also characterises the dystopian world depicted in it. The author engages with hybridity as a plane which illustr

躺下殘殺

CYN

Conclusion: Contemporary Dystopia as an Art of the Possible,asoning and textual analyses conducted in the previous chapters. This power, as the author argues, makes contemporary dystopia an art of the possible. As a continuation and a summary of the previous chapters, the author extends this discussion to a larger corpus of contemporary works from different

osculate

難解