Titlebook: Defining Technological Literacy; Towards an Epistemol John R. Dakers Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006 C

梯田

CLASH

CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance in the field, the various different theories that are currently under discussion.. But before I begin, I would like to clear up a common misunderstanding: philosophy of technology is . closely related to philosophy of science. Science and technology share a similar type of rationality based on empi

frivolous

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10536-9y days of this discipline was fairly critical. Authors such as Martin Heidegger and Jacques Ellul wrote in rather negative terms about the impact of technology on humans and on culture. These authors are commonly reckoned to be the Continental philosophers, the term “Continental” referring to the Eu

GREG

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10536-9 . it is learned. Thus discussions of the nature of technological knowledge centre around philosophical arguments such as how science and technology might differ, or cultural analyses that try to relate knowledge to the nature of technological activity as found in industry and other contexts. These

ineffectual

coagulation

WAIL

TOXIC

CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governancention ceased to be an accidental or rare event and became a methodologically pursued and economically promoted process. In . (1989), historian Thomas P. Hughes even went so far as to compare the achievements of such inventors as Thomas Edison and Henry Ford to those of Renaissance artists. During th

Communal

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10536-9 lay with the author’s intentions: if these could be uncovered, then the meaning of the text was established. One can easily see how, if this is the only true way to establish meaning, there could be difficulties. What if the author was long dead? Or, even if the author was living, how could one tel

狂熱語(yǔ)言