Titlebook: Defining Technological Literacy; Towards an Epistemol John R. Dakers Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006 C

有判斷力

書目名稱Defining Technological Literacy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Defining Technological Literacy影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Defining Technological Literacy網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Defining Technological Literacy網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Defining Technological Literacy被引頻次




書目名稱Defining Technological Literacy被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Defining Technological Literacy年度引用




書目名稱Defining Technological Literacy年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Defining Technological Literacy讀者反饋




書目名稱Defining Technological Literacy讀者反饋學科排名

廢墟

Ebct207

Stricture

infelicitous

How to Understand Mundane Technology: New Ways of Thinking about Human-Technology Relationsiteracy.” As a subject taught in schools, “technology” (often twinned with design) makes certain assumptions about the nature of technology and the humans that engage with it. The design and production of technology is often conceptualized in terms of “fitness for function.” However, the sociology o

喃喃而言

喃喃而言

不來

通知

The Designer Fallacy and Technological Imagination lay with the author’s intentions: if these could be uncovered, then the meaning of the text was established. One can easily see how, if this is the only true way to establish meaning, there could be difficulties. What if the author was long dead? Or, even if the author was living, how could one tel

Notify