Titlebook: Debating Europe in National Parliaments; Public Justification Frank Wendler Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

最高峰

Die Umschichtung im polyphonen Denken,iscursive justification of decisions, institutions, and policies of the EU on the one hand, and the emergence of party political polarization through emerging differences in the use of argumentative frames and political positions, on the other. From this point of departure, the main puzzle of this b

abreast

Debating Europe in National Parliaments978-1-137-51727-2Series ISSN 2662-5873 Series E-ISSN 2662-5881

野蠻

dictator

Data and Method,es for the empirical analysis (Sect. 3.1), the method of data collection through the computer-based text coding of evaluative claims (Sect. 3.2), and the methods applied for subsequent quantitative (Sect. 3.3) and qualitative content analyses (Sect. 3.4).

amorphous

2662-5873 public debate about the EU. Responding to claims about a politicization of European governance, the author investigates the link between two dimensions of debate – the discursive justification and party political contestation of decision-making in the EU. Embedded in a comparison between the legisl

Jogging

大量

卡死偷電

The Discursive Justification of European Integration,s and arguments about Europe, or do we observe similar patterns of justification for European integration across countries? Are various aspects of European integration framed in very different or similar ways in debate, and what role does the reference to norms and interests play in a comparison of constitutional and policy-specific topics?

按等級(jí)

NAV