找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Debating Europe in National Parliaments; Public Justification Frank Wendler Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

[復制鏈接]
樓主: CRUST
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:01:35 | 只看該作者
Introduction,ve brought European issues into the spotlight of public debate (cp. Cramme and Hobolt 2015; Risse 2014). From a political science perspective, studying the public debate about the EU in parliaments is attractive for several reasons. The stances of political actors and parties can be studied firsthan
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:01:53 | 只看該作者
Theoretical Framework,chapter is to show how the model can be adapted to the analysis of public debate on issues of European integration in national parliaments and to present the resulting hypotheses that will guide the empirical analysis.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:33:31 | 只看該作者
Formats of Parliamentary Debate About the European Union,cted as case studies (to be presented in the next chapter). Its aim is to show that considerable differences can be observed particularly between the relatively closed, top-down communication in the French National Assembly, and the more open, relatively balanced, and polarized exchange between parl
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:07:54 | 只看該作者
The Polarization of Parliamentary Parties,an be gained from a differentiation of the three distinct normative frames based on identity, political values, and legitimacy. Second, this chapter traces these links between justification and polarization in a comparative analysis of the five thematic case studies within each of these four levels
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 22:07:34 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:26:51 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,tive to expect a variety of very diverse arguments, debates, and degrees of contention in the public debate on European governance. Against this background, the main argument of the book is to show how evaluative statements about European integration can be systematically linked to observable patter
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:47:57 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09534-7ve brought European issues into the spotlight of public debate (cp. Cramme and Hobolt 2015; Risse 2014). From a political science perspective, studying the public debate about the EU in parliaments is attractive for several reasons. The stances of political actors and parties can be studied firsthan
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:27:48 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09534-7chapter is to show how the model can be adapted to the analysis of public debate on issues of European integration in national parliaments and to present the resulting hypotheses that will guide the empirical analysis.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:56:21 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:52:20 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-23 10:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
岳池县| 万山特区| 绵竹市| 鹤庆县| 淮北市| 探索| 鄂州市| 都兰县| 阿克苏市| 屯昌县| 平利县| 宝山区| 贵溪市| 彭山县| 娄底市| 南澳县| 集安市| 四川省| 长海县| 密云县| 天祝| 梅州市| 临洮县| 公安县| 尖扎县| 上杭县| 延寿县| 灵丘县| 蕉岭县| 融水| 旌德县| 康马县| 肃宁县| 新乡县| 荥经县| 永善县| 育儿| 甘谷县| 太保市| 福贡县| 灵丘县|