找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Debating Europe in National Parliaments; Public Justification Frank Wendler Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

[復制鏈接]
樓主: CRUST
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:01:35 | 只看該作者
Introduction,ve brought European issues into the spotlight of public debate (cp. Cramme and Hobolt 2015; Risse 2014). From a political science perspective, studying the public debate about the EU in parliaments is attractive for several reasons. The stances of political actors and parties can be studied firsthan
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:01:53 | 只看該作者
Theoretical Framework,chapter is to show how the model can be adapted to the analysis of public debate on issues of European integration in national parliaments and to present the resulting hypotheses that will guide the empirical analysis.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:33:31 | 只看該作者
Formats of Parliamentary Debate About the European Union,cted as case studies (to be presented in the next chapter). Its aim is to show that considerable differences can be observed particularly between the relatively closed, top-down communication in the French National Assembly, and the more open, relatively balanced, and polarized exchange between parl
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:07:54 | 只看該作者
The Polarization of Parliamentary Parties,an be gained from a differentiation of the three distinct normative frames based on identity, political values, and legitimacy. Second, this chapter traces these links between justification and polarization in a comparative analysis of the five thematic case studies within each of these four levels
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 22:07:34 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:26:51 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,tive to expect a variety of very diverse arguments, debates, and degrees of contention in the public debate on European governance. Against this background, the main argument of the book is to show how evaluative statements about European integration can be systematically linked to observable patter
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:47:57 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09534-7ve brought European issues into the spotlight of public debate (cp. Cramme and Hobolt 2015; Risse 2014). From a political science perspective, studying the public debate about the EU in parliaments is attractive for several reasons. The stances of political actors and parties can be studied firsthan
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:27:48 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09534-7chapter is to show how the model can be adapted to the analysis of public debate on issues of European integration in national parliaments and to present the resulting hypotheses that will guide the empirical analysis.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:56:21 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:52:20 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-23 10:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
滨海县| 木兰县| 成都市| 许昌市| 安化县| 本溪| 肥乡县| 兰考县| 大田县| 桃源县| 清远市| 文安县| 湟中县| 邵阳县| 贡觉县| 平和县| 武穴市| 泾源县| 绥化市| 江陵县| 涞水县| 龙泉市| 旺苍县| 和硕县| 宿迁市| 巫山县| 大英县| 延川县| 交口县| 天镇县| 甘南县| 长海县| 南安市| 平顺县| 道真| 新巴尔虎左旗| 若尔盖县| 礼泉县| 科尔| 墨脱县| 山丹县|