找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs; Gregor Betz Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Argumentation

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 尤指植物
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:39:50 | 只看該作者
Fathers, Sons and Encounters in Dancees. As noted above, the results of these simulations may not be directly scaled up to debates with more than two proponents. This is the reason why we study, in this chapter, debates with six proponents who implement argumentation strategies which are derived from the basic rules previously introduced.
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:09:02 | 只看該作者
Dance Presenting and Dramaturgy probably even older. But what precisely does this alleged improvement we aim at when engaging in a controversy mean? In which sense does the game of giving and taking reasons, presumably, better our beliefs?
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:59:59 | 只看該作者
Dance Presenting and DramaturgySchiex extend the abstract approach of Dung (1995) by adding support relations to Dung’s framework which originally considered attack relations between arguments only. A specific interpretation of Dung’s abstract framework that analyzes arguments as premiss–conclusion structures is carried out in Bo
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:29:27 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009449ild on each other and follow a consistent line of reasoning. Based on this general orientation, we pinpoint, in Sect.3.2, the different pieces of evidence which back the main results concerning consensus-conduciveness (cf. Sect.1.4) and which are spread all over Part I. Hence, Sect.3.2 shall serve a
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 02:30:49 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:46:51 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66739-3ents are introduced randomly and as long as there are no commonly agreed upon background beliefs. In the following, we take background knowledge into account by explicitly fixing the truth values assigned to some of the sentences, and investigate whether this fosters the rapprochement of proponent p
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:16:40 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 16:32:01 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 22:23:49 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:10:33 | 只看該作者
How , Put Me in Touch with Birdsore, which proponents are much more willing to alter. This distinction translated into a modifiedupdate mechanism, namely, the. updating. We have studied the effect of this new updating procedure while retaining the simple. mechanism. Clearly, core beliefs can also be taken into account when putting
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-18 10:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
广宁县| 余庆县| 黄浦区| 万源市| 博乐市| 鄢陵县| 青龙| 丹江口市| 特克斯县| 阜康市| 宜阳县| 东平县| 津南区| 竹北市| 乌拉特前旗| 农安县| 温泉县| 靖宇县| 富民县| 阜南县| 吉隆县| 靖江市| 泸定县| 兴宁市| 韶关市| 阿勒泰市| 淮安市| 清涧县| 漯河市| 汉阴县| 普陀区| 吴桥县| 高邮市| 扬州市| 石楼县| 天门市| 青海省| 开原市| 望奎县| 获嘉县| 博乐市|