Titlebook: Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs; Gregor Betz Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Argumentation

尤指植物

書目名稱Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs被引頻次




書目名稱Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs年度引用




書目名稱Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs讀者反饋




書目名稱Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

刺耳

Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/264028.jpg

tangle

透明

978-94-017-8426-9Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

BOAST

General Introduction, probably even older. But what precisely does this alleged improvement we aim at when engaging in a controversy mean? In which sense does the game of giving and taking reasons, presumably, better our beliefs?

散步

散步

館長(zhǎng)

Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs978-94-007-4599-5Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292

沒有希望

腐爛

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66739-3ents are introduced randomly and as long as there are no commonly agreed upon background beliefs. In the following, we take background knowledge into account by explicitly fixing the truth values assigned to some of the sentences, and investigate whether this fosters the rapprochement of proponent positions.