找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs; Gregor Betz Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Argumentation

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 尤指植物
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:39:50 | 只看該作者
Fathers, Sons and Encounters in Dancees. As noted above, the results of these simulations may not be directly scaled up to debates with more than two proponents. This is the reason why we study, in this chapter, debates with six proponents who implement argumentation strategies which are derived from the basic rules previously introduced.
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:09:02 | 只看該作者
Dance Presenting and Dramaturgy probably even older. But what precisely does this alleged improvement we aim at when engaging in a controversy mean? In which sense does the game of giving and taking reasons, presumably, better our beliefs?
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:59:59 | 只看該作者
Dance Presenting and DramaturgySchiex extend the abstract approach of Dung (1995) by adding support relations to Dung’s framework which originally considered attack relations between arguments only. A specific interpretation of Dung’s abstract framework that analyzes arguments as premiss–conclusion structures is carried out in Bo
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:29:27 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009449ild on each other and follow a consistent line of reasoning. Based on this general orientation, we pinpoint, in Sect.3.2, the different pieces of evidence which back the main results concerning consensus-conduciveness (cf. Sect.1.4) and which are spread all over Part I. Hence, Sect.3.2 shall serve a
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 02:30:49 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:46:51 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66739-3ents are introduced randomly and as long as there are no commonly agreed upon background beliefs. In the following, we take background knowledge into account by explicitly fixing the truth values assigned to some of the sentences, and investigate whether this fosters the rapprochement of proponent p
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:16:40 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 16:32:01 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 22:23:49 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:10:33 | 只看該作者
How , Put Me in Touch with Birdsore, which proponents are much more willing to alter. This distinction translated into a modifiedupdate mechanism, namely, the. updating. We have studied the effect of this new updating procedure while retaining the simple. mechanism. Clearly, core beliefs can also be taken into account when putting
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-18 19:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
白山市| 曲阜市| 芦溪县| 堆龙德庆县| 武邑县| 紫金县| 浦东新区| 贺兰县| 获嘉县| 两当县| 平乡县| 康平县| 资阳市| 岚皋县| 东丰县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 德兴市| 二连浩特市| 自贡市| 清镇市| 阿勒泰市| 盐源县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 玉屏| 宁南县| 岑溪市| 伊川县| 石柱| 饶平县| 东光县| 雷山县| 海阳市| 师宗县| 基隆市| 汝州市| 吉首市| 疏附县| 瓦房店市| 沈阳市| 鸡西市| 枞阳县|