找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus; Testing the Effectiv John J. Heim Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 statistical

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: DEIFY
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:51:04 | 只看該作者
Does the Gale and Orszag Hypothesis Explain Tax and Spending Effects Better in Recessions Than Non-more true in recessions than non-recession periods. Eight models were tested. The hypothesis that some forms of stimulus might be more effective than others in recessions compared to non-recession periods was not found to be supported by the data. No type of stimulus was found effective in either ty
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:48:52 | 只看該作者
Summary of Findings and Conclusions,ffects of deficit-financed government stimulus programs more than fully offset the stimulus effects of these deficits. Both stimulus and crowd out effects were separately measured in the econometric tests..Results also indicated that the type of tax cut or spending program did not matter, and that t
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:22:09 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 23:29:25 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:27:17 | 只看該作者
Developmental Morphographemics IIIt notes that the models tested were all standard Keynesian models, so as to ensure that evidence that stimulus programs worked had a fair chance to present itself. Discusses how various econometric problems like stationarity, endogeneity, multicollinearity and heteroskedasticity were handled. Discu
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:19:11 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:13:46 | 只看該作者
Virginia A. Mann,Raymond R. Baliseconsumption as well as a stimulus effect. The models included 21 OLS and 26 2SLS models, and 48 tests of the robustness of those results by testing to see if results could be replicated in three different but overlapping time periods. Results overwhelmingly indicated crowd out adversely affected con
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:37:51 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 22:02:11 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:47:28 | 只看該作者
Philip A. Luelsdorff,Sergej V. Chesnokovmulus programs are enacted, from $0.47–$0.89 per dollar of tax cut-induced deficit, to between $0.35–$0.57 per dollar of spending increase-induced deficit. The effect of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Obama stimulus program) is calculated. It was estimated to have negatively aff
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-17 11:00
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
满城县| 遂平县| 黑山县| 康保县| 疏勒县| 淄博市| 鄢陵县| 华坪县| 龙泉市| 长治县| 行唐县| 青海省| 罗平县| 巴南区| 扶沟县| 凌海市| 毕节市| 岑溪市| 漠河县| 宜宾县| 莱西市| 衡水市| 本溪| 松潘县| 清新县| 平和县| 鄂托克前旗| 安图县| 连平县| 盘山县| 登封市| 金昌市| 盱眙县| 武强县| 崇文区| 新民市| 衢州市| 三门县| 龙江县| 理塘县| 鹤山市|