找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Critical Thinking in Biology and Environmental Education; Facing Challenges in Blanca Puig,María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre Book 2022 The Edi

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: protocol
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 06:11:29 | 只看該作者
Educating Critical Citizens to Face Post-truth: The Time Is Nowlopment of their capacity to distinguish truth from post-truth, science from pseudoscience, to face uncertainty, and to make decisions grounded in evidence and values. We propose a revised characterization of the components of CT: a) the use of epistemic criteria in evidence evaluation; b) the dispo
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:41:25 | 只看該作者
Critical Thinking in the Flesh: Movement and Metaphors in a World in Flux vis a’ vis the future, right across from philosophy of biology to anthropology and the cognitive sciences. Arguably, the question of whether, or the extent to which, biology education is actively interfacing with the debates remains unexplored. Starting from the more established definition of criti
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:57:05 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:34:45 | 只看該作者
Culturally Relevant Science Education and Critical Thinking in Indigenous People: Bridging the Gap B practices give space to focus more on real-world issues that consider students’ lives, making science education a space with opportunities for identity development. Working with indigenous students makes us aware of the relevance of students’ knowledge and how this could be considered in the develo
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:06:58 | 只看該作者
The Role of Evidence Evaluation in Critical Thinking: Fostering Epistemic Vigilanceews. Moreover, evaluating scientific evidence (even simplified evidence presented in the media) entails some disciplinary knowledge of core concepts in the domain and an understanding of the epistemic criteria for what counts as good evidence in that domain. In our work we have examined how secondar
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:54:30 | 只看該作者
Supporting Critical Thinking Through Engagement in Dialogic Argumentation: Taking Multiple Consideraof Genetically Modified Food. Results showed that participants considered more aspects of the socio scientific issue at the final assessment, as this was reflected in the greater diversity of arguments produced (e.g. social, ecological, ethical, economic, scientific), compared to the initial assessm
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:12:18 | 只看該作者
Critical Thinking to Decide What to Believe and What to Do Regarding Vaccination in Schools. A Case ing action based on reason and critical thinking. The increasing number of opponents to vaccination have become worrying and it should be addressed in teachers’ training programmes and in biology lessons when looking at the topic of health. This chapter presents a case study research conducted with
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 12:32:37 | 只看該作者
Students’ Thinking Strategies and the Role of Argument as a Shared Thinking Tooln support important educational goals, such as learning science, getting familiar with the scientific culture, acquiring scientific literacy, training for active citizenship and developing critical thinking. Argumentation and critical thinking appear to be closely related; they share some of their c
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:06:05 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 16:48:25 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-29 00:32
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
永城市| 闵行区| 三原县| 琼结县| 南丰县| 五大连池市| 苗栗县| 东阳市| 同心县| 黄冈市| 吉林省| 大冶市| 长寿区| 满洲里市| 兴国县| 瑞丽市| 隆安县| 佛坪县| 牡丹江市| 普安县| 定日县| 宁德市| 华蓥市| 镇安县| 邮箱| 滁州市| 花垣县| 石渠县| 武清区| 红桥区| 上杭县| 常山县| 彩票| 红河县| 石河子市| 瓦房店市| 定州市| 乡宁县| 石景山区| 壶关县| 务川|