找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Contagion and the Shakespearean Stage; Darryl Chalk,Mary Floyd-Wilson Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 Disea

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 新石器時代
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 22:17:26 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-24798-3ten did so in ways not limited to medical inquiry or the narrow study of a particular disease. In addition to outlining an approach to understanding pre-modern theories of contagion in relation to the efficacy of theatre in this period, he provides a guide to the interweaving concerns of the contributions to this collection.
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:34:52 | 只看該作者
,Erd?l und seine Verarbeitungsprodukte,in which all transgressions are triggered by touch. Focusing on the demonic agency given to infection, Johnston argues that the devil enables a synthesis of etiologies. The play follows a Frascatorian exogenous model of pathology but it does so within the bounds of an endogenous understanding rooted in the idea of galenic humours.
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:01:49 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-24804-1espeare correlates kissing and contagion in ., ultimately arguing that Shakespeare shows how men’s breath, in the form of words, carries more danger than Cressida’s breath, in the form of kisses, due to the male characters’ continual misinterpretation of Cressida’s words, intentions, and actions.
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 12:28:25 | 只看該作者
,Erd?l und seine Verarbeitungsprodukte,nguage of disease. Understanding how this premodern language of contagion operates in ., this essay resituates the play in its multicultural context, demonstrating how contagion might serve not simply as a source of anxiety but as a metaphor for the fraught operation of pity.
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 16:28:36 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 19:27:22 | 只看該作者
Helmut B?rkircher,Peter J. Lehmeiert in striving to ensure its subsistence, theater must constantly infect new “carriers.” With a brief look to the play’s afterlife within today’s increasingly digital literary landscape, the chapter claims that Shakespeare’s play essentially went viral before “going viral” rose to cultural prominence.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 23:58:03 | 只看該作者
Book 2019 essays focused on early modern drama and the culture of theater, contributors explore how ideas of contagion not only inform representations of the senses (such as smell and touch) and emotions (such as disgust, pity, and shame) but also shape how people understood belief, narrative, and political
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 04:13:04 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:04:51 | 只看該作者
“Go Touch His Life”: Contagious Malice and the Power of Touch in in which all transgressions are triggered by touch. Focusing on the demonic agency given to infection, Johnston argues that the devil enables a synthesis of etiologies. The play follows a Frascatorian exogenous model of pathology but it does so within the bounds of an endogenous understanding rooted in the idea of galenic humours.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 14:24:44 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 20:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
湘阴县| 伊金霍洛旗| 新建县| 佛学| 清水县| 木兰县| 仁寿县| 南丰县| 吉隆县| 遵义市| 柳林县| 临猗县| 盐城市| 尤溪县| 绥芬河市| 汪清县| 河池市| 登封市| 北京市| 阳西县| 湖州市| 淮北市| 泊头市| 会宁县| 文山县| 仙桃市| 怀远县| 昌都县| 富裕县| 淅川县| 工布江达县| 宜章县| 九江县| 北碚区| 吉林市| 泰顺县| 万年县| 边坝县| 嘉黎县| 栾城县| 海林市|