找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Communicating Popular Science; From Deficit to Demo Sarah Tinker Perrault Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

[復制鏈接]
查看: 8383|回復: 43
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:59:09 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Communicating Popular Science
副標題From Deficit to Demo
編輯Sarah Tinker Perrault
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/231/230358/230358.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Communicating Popular Science; From Deficit to Demo Sarah Tinker Perrault Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers
描述Technoscientific developments often have far-reaching consequences, both negative and positive, for the public. Yet, because science has the authority to decide which judgments about scientific issues are sound, public concerns are often dismissed because they are not part of the technoscientific paradigm they question. This book addresses the role of science popularization in that paradox; it explains how science writing works and argues that it can do better at promoting public discussions about science-related issues. To support these arguments, it situates science popularization in its historical and cultural context; provides a conceptual framework for analyzing popular science texts; and examines the rhetorical effects of common strategies used in popular science writing. Twenty-six years after Dorothy Nelkin‘s groundbreaking book, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology, popular science writing is still not meeting its potential as a public interest genre; Communicating Popular Science explores how it can move closer to doing so.
出版日期Book 2013
關(guān)鍵詞democracy; history of science; Popular Science; science
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137017581
isbn_softcover978-1-349-43713-9
isbn_ebook978-1-137-01758-1
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Communicating Popular Science影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Communicating Popular Science影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Communicating Popular Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Communicating Popular Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Communicating Popular Science被引頻次




書目名稱Communicating Popular Science被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Communicating Popular Science年度引用




書目名稱Communicating Popular Science年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Communicating Popular Science讀者反饋




書目名稱Communicating Popular Science讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:17:05 | 只看該作者
Popular Science Writing: Problems and PotentialIn studying science communication, especially popular science writing, I have found that two cultures exist on either side of a divide. I speak not of the two-cultures gap between science and literature that C. P. Snow lamented in 1959, but of a gap within the ranks of those who write about scientific issues for nonspecialist readers.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:03:18 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:24:14 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137017581democracy; history of science; Popular Science; science
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:11:11 | 只看該作者
978-1-349-43713-9Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:27:58 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:47:25 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:01:53 | 只看該作者
Soft Computing Methods in Human SciencesTS) in academic circles, the call for a new social contract from within science, and the call for a new model of communication from within the world of science popularization. These many sources agree with Nicholas Russell that the public ‘must be able to critique science as well as support it’ and
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:38:29 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:59:07 | 只看該作者
Emilio Corchado,Václav Sná?el,Dominik ?l?zakl level depicts science as separate from (and nearly always superior to) other forms of knowledge-making, demarcation work at the individual level determines who does and doesn’t have authority to talk about a particular issue. Often this determination is based on claims of expertise, with categoriz
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-25 22:08
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
衡阳县| 故城县| 六安市| 建德市| 老河口市| 防城港市| 秦皇岛市| 九龙县| 麦盖提县| 无锡市| 镇巴县| 驻马店市| 穆棱市| 金秀| 启东市| 六枝特区| 永春县| 芦山县| 峨边| 天峨县| 德惠市| 应城市| 阿瓦提县| 济宁市| 渭源县| 武宁县| 乌兰县| 洪江市| 紫云| 呼和浩特市| 伊宁县| 申扎县| 睢宁县| 南陵县| 德兴市| 阆中市| 千阳县| 贡山| 南涧| 宜兰县| 辽阳市|