Titlebook: Charles Hartshorne‘s Concept of God; Philosophical and Th Santiago Sia Book 1990 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1990 Buddhism.Indian.

ungainly

無法取消

Gerontology

橡子

,Charles Hartshorne’s Philosophy of God: A Thomistic Critique,y and presents us with a God that is a totally admirable person, worthy of deep religious reverence and love. It is not surprising to me that some of the authors who have written on it declare that this is the only brand of theism they could accept.

無聊的人

,Can the God of Process Thought be “Redeemed”?,nnings in Plato and Aristotle through its fulfillment in Hegel, metaphysics has in fact been ‘onto-theology.’ This means, in Heidegger’s terminology, that the difference between Being and beings — the ‘ontological difference’ — has been overlooked, because Being (as the event of coming into unconcea

稱贊

雜役

,Some Remarks on Charles Hartshorne’s Conception of Theology,osophy of God. The latter is also designated by the following terms: rational theology, natural theology, theodicy, and even ., the philosophy of religion. The starting point for theology in the first of the above senses is the data of revelation in some concrete religion, which revelation is subjec

起波瀾

Continuity and Novelty: A Contribution to the Dialogue between Buddhism and Process Thought,phy may have more obvious parallels with Indian or Chinese ways of thinking than Western.. In his references specifically to Buddhism, however, Whitehead is largely negative.. Hartshorne has seen the relationship more positively and has noted points of affinity as well as difference. This paper will

Abutment

profligate