找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Britain’s War Powers; The Fall and Rise of Tara McCormack Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licenc

[復制鏈接]
查看: 11785|回復: 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:26:36 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Britain’s War Powers
期刊簡稱The Fall and Rise of
影響因子2023Tara McCormack
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/191/190986/190986.mp4
發(fā)行地址Provides an up to date account of Britain’s war powers and the central questions of authority and legitimacy.Situates the fall and rise of executive authority in the context of the declining legitimac
圖書封面Titlebook: Britain’s War Powers; The Fall and Rise of Tara McCormack Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licenc
影響因子.This book provides a state of the art discussion of the royal prerogative over war powers in the UK. This issue has received particular attention over proposed military strikes against the Syrian regime and it was claimed by many observers and scholars that parliament now controls decisions in war. However, the record has been mixed– and the most recent decision by Prime Minister May on Syria in 2018 shows that the executive can re-assert prerogative powers and effectively sidestep parliament. The author argues that these dynamics should be seen in the context of the declining authority of the executive and the legislature and in terms of a policy solution, and ultimately she suggests a War Powers Act as a firmer foundation for Britain’s war powers..
Pindex Book 2019
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Britain’s War Powers影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers網絡公開度




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers被引頻次




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers年度引用




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers讀者反饋




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:04:59 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:32:10 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:59:14 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13682-6War Powers Act; British politics; British Syrian strikes; prime minister powers; executive powers; legisl
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:32:13 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:59:09 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:46:14 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:27:49 | 只看該作者
Conceptualising Securitisation,n on authorising war. The chapter then analyses the way in which the Royal Prerogative became a political concern in the post-Cold War and the problem of legitimacy that was faced by post-Cold War British governments.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:00:28 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:21:15 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3372-9reasons put forward by May for not consulting Parliament including the legal basis for the strikes put forward by the government. In conclusion, I argue that the justification for ignoring the new Parliamentary Convention was very weak. An overview of the justifications given and the reality of the
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 04:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
金昌市| 沙坪坝区| 蒙山县| 临泉县| 西城区| 衡山县| 沙坪坝区| 临猗县| 道真| 景宁| 普格县| 云梦县| 永吉县| 浙江省| 犍为县| 安图县| 沂源县| 桑日县| 上虞市| 东源县| 英吉沙县| 汾阳市| 乳山市| 陆川县| 宣城市| 台南县| 资兴市| 荔浦县| 肥城市| 温宿县| 炉霍县| 安平县| 河源市| 霍林郭勒市| 南和县| 澄江县| 无棣县| 普定县| 佛学| 新河县| 塘沽区|