找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Britain’s War Powers; The Fall and Rise of Tara McCormack Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licenc

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 11787|回復(fù): 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:26:36 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Britain’s War Powers
期刊簡(jiǎn)稱The Fall and Rise of
影響因子2023Tara McCormack
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/191/190986/190986.mp4
發(fā)行地址Provides an up to date account of Britain’s war powers and the central questions of authority and legitimacy.Situates the fall and rise of executive authority in the context of the declining legitimac
圖書封面Titlebook: Britain’s War Powers; The Fall and Rise of Tara McCormack Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licenc
影響因子.This book provides a state of the art discussion of the royal prerogative over war powers in the UK. This issue has received particular attention over proposed military strikes against the Syrian regime and it was claimed by many observers and scholars that parliament now controls decisions in war. However, the record has been mixed– and the most recent decision by Prime Minister May on Syria in 2018 shows that the executive can re-assert prerogative powers and effectively sidestep parliament. The author argues that these dynamics should be seen in the context of the declining authority of the executive and the legislature and in terms of a policy solution, and ultimately she suggests a War Powers Act as a firmer foundation for Britain’s war powers..
Pindex Book 2019
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Britain’s War Powers影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers被引頻次




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers年度引用




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers讀者反饋




書目名稱Britain’s War Powers讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:04:59 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:32:10 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:59:14 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13682-6War Powers Act; British politics; British Syrian strikes; prime minister powers; executive powers; legisl
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:32:13 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:59:09 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:46:14 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:27:49 | 只看該作者
Conceptualising Securitisation,n on authorising war. The chapter then analyses the way in which the Royal Prerogative became a political concern in the post-Cold War and the problem of legitimacy that was faced by post-Cold War British governments.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:00:28 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:21:15 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3372-9reasons put forward by May for not consulting Parliament including the legal basis for the strikes put forward by the government. In conclusion, I argue that the justification for ignoring the new Parliamentary Convention was very weak. An overview of the justifications given and the reality of the
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 12:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
深州市| 鄂尔多斯市| 云梦县| 武宣县| 肥东县| 沁水县| 昌宁县| 甘洛县| 扶绥县| 海门市| 和田市| 靖西县| 长治市| 南江县| 沧州市| 合山市| 宣威市| 临澧县| 盱眙县| 通许县| 梓潼县| 玉树县| 清苑县| 桐乡市| 高邮市| 基隆市| 香河县| 昭觉县| 延吉市| 沭阳县| 抚顺县| 瑞安市| 大理市| 华坪县| 佛山市| 松原市| 绵阳市| 维西| 日喀则市| 永春县| 察哈|