Titlebook: Beyond the Canon; History for the Twen Maria Grever (Professor of Theory and Methodology Book 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmi

Obsequious

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08606-2ntury to the French Revolution of 1789. That is history. But the Enlightenment has somehow refused to be safely consigned to ‘history’ in the same way as the Crusades, the Roman Empire or the world of ancient China. It is somehow ‘too close’ to us and too much part of ‘who we are’. Precisely because

破譯

Strategisches Kompetenz-Managementuilding. Especially historians, but also linguists and scholars of literature, acted in the nineteenth century as the godfathers of romantic nationalism. The humanities or . had an important social and cultural stake in the education of national citizens, and are to a large extent responsible for th

連系

不如樂死去

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99911-5rical narrative to illustrate what was most essential to ‘our’ culture.’ This is not so remarkable, in that since the nineteenth century one of history’s most important — and most contested — uses has been the justification, characterization and marking off of national identities. What . remarkable,

極端的正確性

Proponent

Recessive

對待

Internationalisierung und Gesch?ftserfolgand their exclusion of ‘deviant’ or dissenting memories and experiences. The histories of women and migrants, for example, have often been absent from national canons. Women’s lives were regarded as private and domestic experiences, and therefore irrelevant to a national canon defined by state forma

Bravura

小蟲