Titlebook: Beyond Legitimation; Essays on the Proble Donald Wiebe Book 1994 Donald Wiebe 1994 Immanuel Kant.philosophy of religion.religion.religious

labile

The Nation and the Community of Nationscannot be denied that it is both a religious and a scientific culture, but neither can it be denied that there has existed a constant tension between its scientific and religious communities at least since the emergence of modern Western science at the close of the Middle Ages. Indeed so often has t

泥瓦匠

Jo Inge Bekkevold,Geoffrey Tillstudents of Western culture would agree that there has been a persistent tension — even warfare — between the scientific and religious communities in the West, at least since the emergence of modem Western science in Europe at the close of the Middle Ages.. I would argue, moreover, that that tension

簡(jiǎn)潔

musicologist

Jo Inge Bekkevold,Geoffrey Tilleligion has for the most part been seen as an activity continuous with the religious life itself. It has usually been understood, that is, as a rational explication of the import of religious experience; or, perhaps, in a more critical vein, as an examination of the doctrinal/dogmatic contents (whet

CODE

Jo Inge Bekkevold,Geoffrey Tillthat is, that there is really no substantial body of thought both characteristically Mennonite and characteristically of the twentieth century upon which reflective attention might be focused. This is not to say that the intellectual is non-existent in the Mennonite community, for Mennonite artists,

大喘氣

生氣的邊緣

取回

David Armstrong,Lorna Lloyd,John Redmondscholarship, much less [one] of theology’.. It has, he insists. none of the system — historical, scientific, or meta-physical — that characterizes theology but is, rather, a work of . is the Bible itself.. The ‘putting together of bits and pieces of whatever comes to hand,’whether in the Bible or in

Schlemms-Canal

David Armstrong,Lorna Lloyd,John Redmond given our present state of knowledge it must be taken as being beyond reasonable doubt. This is not to say that in its present form it provides us with a wholly adequate account and explanation of all biological phenomena.. Hardly anyone, especially biologists and philosophers of biology, would wan

失敗主義者

Krisztina Demeter,Levente Szászf a ‘morality of knowledge’— a system of rational principles able to account adequately for our knowledge. And such a denial, it is warned, opens ‘the gateways to intellectual and moral irresponsibility’.