Titlebook: Believing in Accordance with the Evidence; New Essays on Eviden Kevin McCain Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Spring

chalice

Evidentialism and Moral Encroachmentre evidence is required to justify the belief. Moral encroachment thereby opposes evidentialism, and kindred views, which holds that epistemic justification is determined solely by factors pertaining to evidence and truth. In this essay I explain how beliefs such as ‘that woman is probably an admini

Terrace

Insulin

Standing in a Garden of Forking Paths this evidence provides. Whenever a thinker properly added a belief to her belief set, this is (in part) because her evidence provided her a path that took her to this belief. Whenever a thinker cannot properly add a belief to her belief set, this is because her evidence does not provide her with th

未開(kāi)化

Evidentialism, Time-Slice Mentalism, and Dreamless Sleep properties at . are grounded only by one’s mental properties at .; (2) .: all ultimate evidence is experiential; and (3) .: we have justified beliefs while we have dreamless, nonexperiential sleep. Although I intend for this paper to be a polemic against evidentialists, it can also be viewed as an

詞根詞綴法

No Kind of Reason Is the Wrong Kind of Reasono .?bear on the object of the attitude in a way that is relevant to determining whether the attitude is appropriate. When applied to belief it is often taken as a datum that the only genuine or “right” reasons for belief are those that bear directly on the question of “whether p”; such reasons are o

危機(jī)

Believing in Accordance with the Evidence978-3-319-95993-1Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292

有雜色

Thomas Sterr,Dietfried G. Liesegangat such justification supervenes on an agent’s evidence. Additionally, the chapter explains that evidentialism requires more clarification and detailing. Finally, short summaries of the other chapters included in this book are provided in this chapter.

Amplify

crucial

Thomas Sterr,Dietfried G. Liesegangat such justification supervenes on an agent’s evidence. Additionally, the chapter explains that evidentialism requires more clarification and detailing. Finally, short summaries of the other chapters included in this book are provided in this chapter.

intrude