Titlebook: Believing in Accordance with the Evidence; New Essays on Eviden Kevin McCain Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Spring

Emasculate

聯(lián)邦

窒息

The Evidence in Evidentialismonly acceptable on its own, but acceptable when conjoined with evidentialism. This challenge asks the evidentialist to go beyond just sounding right. In Sect. 3.1, I consider the prospects for answering the challenge by taking what I call the . approach. Under this approach, having evidence supporti

Peak-Bone-Mass

Interstellar

Phenomenal Dogmatism, Seeming Evidentialism and Inferential Justificationhe agent’s possession, and (ii) the evidence constitutes a good reason for the belief. Strong normative evidentialism faces two challenges. One is that of explaining which kinds of evidence can serve as a good reason for belief. The other is to explain how inferential justification is possible. If a

斥責(zé)

incision

Metacognition As Evidence for Evidentialismich it is intuitive that via recollection the subject has a justified belief. Drawing on psychological research on metacognition, I argue that evidentialism has a unique, accurate prediction in each ordinary retrieval case: the subject has evidence for the proposition she justifiedly believes. But,

確定的事

Externalist Versions of Evidentialismms of externalism can be evidentialist views. After saying what evidentialism is and identifying four grades of externalism, I argue that, for each of these grades of externalism (from the least external first grade to the most external fourth grade), there is a version of evidentialism exhibiting t

并置

An Evidentialist Social Epistemology memory, intuition, and inference. Evidentialists have given less attention to social epistemology, with the important exception of the epistemic significance of peer disagreement. Taking its cue from this literature, in this essay I will sketch the outlines of a unified evidentialist social epistem

PHIL