Titlebook: Belief Revision in Non-Classical Logics; Márcio Moretto Ribeiro Book 2013 The Author(s) 2013 AGM Theory.Belief Revision.Knowledge Represen

有效

AGM Revision in Logics Without Negation,truction for revision in belief sets that doesn’t depend on negation. This construction is characterized by AGM postulates in well behaved logics. Furthermore, it is presented a set of postulates that characterizes this construction in any distributive and compact logic.

Arctic

Nutrient

Book 2013 Logics such as the ones behind OWL – Horn Logic and Intuitionistic logic, amongst others. The author also presents algorithms for the most important constructions in belief bases. Researchers and practitioners in theoretical computing will find this an invaluable resource..

gerontocracy

2191-5768 -DL.Awarded the best paper prize by the Brazilian Computer S.Since the advent of the Semantic Web, interest in the dynamics of ontologies (ontology evolution) has grown significantly. Belief revision presents a good theoretical framework for dealing with this problem; however, classical belief revis

Comprise

Stephan Wildner,Oliver Koch,Uwe Webery to non-classical logics has grown rapidly. The first results on belief revision in Description Logics (DL) showed problems in applying “classical belief revision theory” (AGM theory) to these logics. The aim of this book is to show how to adapt belief revision theory to make it applicable to a wider class of logics that includes most DLs.

padding

事物的方面

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16527-7evance and recovery are equivalent. In this chapter, we defend the use of relevance instead of recovery in non-classical logics for mainly three reasons: relevance deals more directly with minimality, it is compliant with a wider class of logics, and it better characterizes partial meet contraction.

FER

Introduction,y to non-classical logics has grown rapidly. The first results on belief revision in Description Logics (DL) showed problems in applying “classical belief revision theory” (AGM theory) to these logics. The aim of this book is to show how to adapt belief revision theory to make it applicable to a wider class of logics that includes most DLs.

BILK

Parallel